原文被我改编过,题目是,Ships in the
Desert
Like the population explosion, the
scientific and
technological revolution began to pick up speed slowly during the
eighteenth century. And this ongoing revolution has also suddenly
accelerated exponentially. For example, it is now an axiom in
many fields of science that more new and important discoveries have
taken place in the last ten years that. in the entire previous
history of science. While no single discovery has had the kind
of effect on our
relationship to the earth that unclear weapons
have had on our
relationship to warfare, it is
nevertheless true
that taken together, they have completely transformed our
cumulative
ability to
exploit the earth for sustenance -- making the
consequences, of unrestrained exploitation every bit as unthinkable
as the consequences of unrestrained nuclear war.
Now that our
relationship to the earth has changed so utterly, we
have to see that change and understand its implications. Our
challenge is to recognize that the
startling images of
environmental
destruction now occurring all over the world have
much more in common than their
ability to shock and
awaken us.
They are symptoms of an
underlying problem broader in scope and
more serious than any we have ever faced. Global warming, ozone
depletion, the loss of living species, deforestation -- they all
have a common cause: the new
relationship between human
civilization and the earth's natural balance. There are actually
two aspects to this challenge. The first is to realize that our
power to harm the earth can in-deed have global and even permanent
effects. The second is to realize that the only way to
understand our new role as a co-architect of nature is to see
ourselves as part of a
complexsystem that does not operate
according to the same simple rules of cause and effect we are used
to. The problem is not our effect on the
environment so much as
our
relationship with the environment. As a result, any solution
to the problem will require a careful assessment of that
relationship as well as the
complex interrelationship among factors
within
civilization and between them and the major natural
components of the earth's ecological
system. There is only
one
precedent for this kind of
challenge to our thinking, and again
it is military. The
invention of nuclear weapons and the subsequent
development by the
Unit-ed States
and the Soviet Union
of many thousands of strategic nuclear weapons forced a
slow and
painfulrecognition that the new power thus acquired
forever changed not only the
relationship between the two
superpowers but also the
relationship of humankind to the
institution at war-fare itself. The consequences of all-out war
between nations armed with nuclear weapons suddenly included the
possibility of the
destruction of both nations - completely and
simultaneously. That sobering
realization led to a careful
reassessment of every
aspect of our
mutualrelationship to the
prospect of such a war. As early as 1946 one strategist concluded
that strategic bombing with missiles "may well tear away the veil
of
illusion that has so long obscured the
reality of the change in
warfare - from a fight to a process of destruction."