it about with us for a life-time, though it has no
second-hand and
is not a repeater, nor a
musical watch, - though it is not
enamelled nor jewelled, - in short, though it has little beyond the
wheels required for a trustworthy
instrument, added to a good face
and a pair of useful hands. The more wheels there are in a watch
or a brain, the more trouble they are to take care of. The
movements of exaltation which belong to
genius are egotistic by
their very nature. A calm, clear mind, not subject to the spasms
and crises which are so often met with in
creative or intensely
perceptive natures, is the best basis for love or friendship. -
Observe, I am talking about MINDS. I won't say, the more
intellect, the less
capacity for
loving; for that would do wrong to
the under
standing and reason; - but, on the other hand, that the
brain often runs away with the heart's best blood, which gives the
world a few pages of
wisdom or
sentiment or
poetry, instead of
making one other heart happy, I have no question.
If one's
intimate in love or friendship cannot or does not share
all one's
intellectual" target="_blank" title="n.知识分子">
intellectual tastes or pursuits, that is a small matter.
Intellectual companions can be found easily in men and books.
After all, if we think of it, most of the world's loves and
friendships have been between people that could not read nor spell.
But to
radiate the heat of the affections into a clod which absorbs
all that is poured into it, but never warms beneath the
sunshine of
smiles or the
pressure of hand or lip, - this is the great
martyrdom of
sensitive beings, - most of all in that
perpetual AUTO
DA FE where young wo
manhood is the sacrifice.
- You noticed, perhaps, what I just said about the loves and
friendships of
illiterate persons, - that is, of the human race,
with a few exceptions here and there. I like books, - I was born
and bred among them, and have the easy feeling, when I get into
their presence, that a stable-boy has among horses. I don't think
I undervalue them either as companions or as instructors. But I
can't help remembering that the world's great men have not commonly
been great scholars, nor its great scholars great men. The Hebrew
patriarchs had small libraries, I think, if any; yet they represent
to our imaginations a very complete idea of
manhood, and, I think,
if we could ask in Abraham to dine with us men of letters next
Saturday, we should feel honored by his company.
What I wanted to say about books is this: that there are times in
which every active mind feels itself above any and all human books.
- I think a man must have a good opinion of himself, Sir, - said
the divinity-student, - who should feel himself above Shakspeare at
any time.
My young friend, - I replied, - the man who is never
conscious of a
state of feeling or of
intellectual" target="_blank" title="n.知识分子">
intellectual effort entirely beyond
expression by any form of words
whatsoever is a mere creature of
language. I can hardly believe there are any such men. Why, think
for a moment of the power of music. The nerves that make us alive
to it spread out (so the Professor tells me) in the most
sensitiveregion of the
marrow just where it is widening to run
upwards into
the hemispheres. It has its seat in the region of sense rather
than of thought. Yet it produces a
continuous and, as it were,
logical
sequence of
emotional and
intellectual" target="_blank" title="n.知识分子">
intellectual changes; but how
different from trains of thought proper! how entirely beyond the
reach of symbols! - Think of human passions as compared with all
phrases! Did you ever hear of a man's growing lean by the
readingof "Romeo and Juliet," or blowing his brains out because Desdemona
was maligned? There are a good many symbols, even, that are more
expressive than words. I remember a young wife who had to part
with her husband for a time. She did not write a
mournful poem;
indeed, she was a silent person, and perhaps hardly said a word
about it; but she quietly turned of a deep orange color with
jaundice. A great many people in this world have but one form of
rhetoric for their profoundest experiences, -
namely, to waste away
and die. When a man can READ, his paroxysm of feeling is passing.
When he can READ, his thought has slackened its hold. - You talk
about
reading Shakspeare, using him as an expression for the
highest
intellect, and you wonder that any common person should be
so presumptuous as to suppose his thought can rise above the text
which lies before him. But think a moment. A child's
reading of
Shakspeare is one thing, and Coleridge's or Schlegel's
reading of