hired an EARTHQUAKE for less money!]
Just as we find a
mathematical rule at the bottom of many of the
bodily movements, just so thought may be
supposed to have its
regular cycles. Such or such a thought comes round
periodically,
in its turn. Accidental suggestions, however, so far
interferewith the regular cycles, that we may find them practically beyond
our power of
recognition. Take all this for what it is worth, but
at any rate you will agree that there are certain particular
thoughts that do not come up once a day, nor once a week, but that
a year would hardly go round without your having them pass through
your mind. Here is one which comes up at
intervals in this way.
Some one speaks of it, and there is an
instant and eager smile of
assent in the
listener or
listeners. Yes, indeed; they have often
been struck by it.
ALL AT ONCE A CONVICTION FLASHES THROUGH US THAT WE HAVE BEEN IN
THE SAME PRECISE CIRCUMSTANCES AS AT THE PRESENT INSTANT, ONCE OR
MANY TIMES BEFORE.
O, dear, yes! - said one of the company, - everybody has had that
feeling.
The
landlady didn't know anything about such notions; it was an
idee in folks' heads, she expected.
The
schoolmistress said, in a hesitating sort of way, that she knew
the feeling well, and didn't like to experience it; it made her
think she was a ghost, sometimes.
The young fellow whom they call John said he knew all about it; he
had just lighted a cheroot the other day, when a tremendous
conviction all at once came over him that he had done just that
same thing ever so many times before. I looked
severely at him,
and his
countenance immediately fell - ON THE SIDE TOWARD ME; I
cannot answer for the other, for he can wink and laugh with either
half of his face without the other half's
knowing it.
- I have noticed - I went on to say - the following circumstances
connected with these sudden
impressions. First, that the condition
which seems to be the
duplicate of a former one is often very
trivial, - one that might have presented itself a hundred times.
Secondly, that the
impression is very evanescent, and that it is
rarely, if ever, recalled by any
voluntary effort, at least after
any time has elapsed. Thirdly, that there is a disinclination to
record the circumstances, and a sense of incapacity to reproduce
the state of mind in words. Fourthly, I have often felt that the
duplicate condition had not only occurred once before, but that it
was familiar and, as it seemed,
habitual. Lastly, I have had the
same
convictions in my dreams.
How do I
account for it? - Why, there are several ways that I can
mention, and you may take your choice. The first is that which the
young lady hinted at; - that these flashes are sudden recollections
of a
previousexistence. I don't believe that; for I remember a
poor student I used to know told me he had such a
conviction one
day when he was blacking his boots, and I can't think he had ever
lived in another world where they use Day and Martin.
Some think that Dr. Wigan's
doctrine of the brain's being a double
organ, its hemispheres
working together like the two eyes,
accounts
for it. One of the hemispheres hangs fire, they suppose, and the
small
interval between the
perceptions of the
nimble and the
sluggish half seems an
indefinitely" target="_blank" title="ad.模糊地;无限期地">
indefinitely long period, and
therefore the
second
perception appears to be the copy of another, ever so old.
But even allowing the centre of
perception to be double, I can see
no good reason for supposing this
indefinite lengthening of the
time, nor any
analogy that bears it out. It seems to me most
likely that the
coincidence of circumstances is very
partial, but
that we take this
partialresemblance for
identity, as we
occasionally do
resemblances of persons. A
momentaryposture of
circumstances is so far like some
preceding one that we accept it
as exactly the same, just as we accost a stranger
occasionally,
mistaking him for a friend. The
apparent similarity may be owing
perhaps, quite as much to the
mental state at the time, as to the
outward circumstances.
- Here is another of these
curiously recurring remarks. I have
said it, and heard it many times, and
occasionally met with
something like it in books, - somewhere in Bulwer's novels, I
think, and in one of the works of Mr. Olmsted, I know.