of the other, 'it is a present of which you must take care,'
namely, 'a little stranger' at hand.
Two
singular facts throw light on the kind of dice used some 100
and 150 years ago. In an old cribbage card-box, curiously
ornamented,
supposed to have been made by an
amateur in the reign
of Queen Anne, and now in my possession, I found a die with one
end fashioned to a point,
evidently for the purpose of spinning--
similar to the modern teetotum. With the same lot at the sale
where it was bought, was a pack of cards made of ivory, about an
inch and a half in length and one inch in width--in other
respects exactly like the cards of the period.
Again, it is stated that in
taking up the floors of the Middle
Temple Hall, about the year 1764, nearly 100 pairs of dice were
found, which had dropped, on
different occasions, through the
chinks or joints of the boards. They were very small, at least
one-third less that those now in use. Certainly the benchers of
those times did not keep the floor of their
magnificent hall in a
very
decent condition.
A curious fact relating to dice may here be
pointed out. Each of
the six sides of a die is so dotted or numbered that the top and
bottom of every die (taken together) make 7; for if the top or
uppermost side is 5, the bottom or opposite side will be 2; and
the same holds through every face;
therefore, let the number of
dice be what it may, their top and bottom faces, added together,
must be equal to the number of dice multiplied by 7. In throwing
three dice, if 2, 3, and 4 are thrown, making 9, their
corresponding bottom faces will be 5, 4, and 3, making 12, which
together are 21--equal to the three dice multiplied by 7.
CARDS.
The
origin of cards is as
doubtful as that of dice. All that we
know for certain is that they were first used in the East. Some
think that the figures at first used on them were of moral
import: the Hindoo and Chinese cards are certainly emblematic in
a very high degree; the former
illustrate the ten avatars, or
incarnations of the deity Vishnu; and the
so-called 'paper-
tickets' of the Chinese typify the stars, the human virtues, and,
indeed, every
variety of subject. Sir William Jones was
convinced that the Hindoo game of Chaturaji--that is, 'the Four
Rajahs or Kings'--a
species of highly-complicated chess--was the
first germ of that parti-coloured pasteboard, which has been the
ruin of so many modern fortunes. A pack of Hindoostani cards, in
the possession of the Royal Asiatic Society, and presented to
Captain Cromline Smith in 1815, by a high caste Brahman, was
declared by the donor to be
actually 1000 years old: 'Nor,' said
the Brahman, 'can any of us now play at them, for they are not
like our modern cards at all.' Neither, indeed, do they bear any
remarkable
resemblance to our own--the pack consisting of no less
than eight sorts of
divers colours, the kings being mounted upon
elephants, and viziers, or second honours, upon horses, tigers,
and bulls. Moreover, there are other marks distinguishing the
respective value of the common cards, which would
puzzle our
club-quidnuncs not a little--such as 'a pine-apple in a shallow
cup,' and a something like a parasol without a handle, and with
two broken ribs sticking through the top. The Chinese cards have
the
advantage over those of Hindoostan by being oblong instead of
circular.
It was not before the end of the 14th century that cards became
known in Europe; and it is a curious fact that the French clergy
took greatly to card-playing about that time--their favourite
game being the rather ungenteel 'All Fours,' as now reputed; for
they were
speciallyforbidden that pastime by the Synod of
Langres in 1404.
The ancient cards of both Spain and France, particularly the
'court-cards,'
exhibit strong marks of the age of
chivalry; but
here we may observe that the word is written by some ancient
writers, 'coate-cards,'
evidently signifying no more than figures
in particular dresses. The giving pre-eminence or
victory to a
certain suit, by the name of 'trump,' which is only a corruption
of the word 'triumph,' is a strong trait of the
martial ideas of
the inventors of these games. So that, if the Chinese started
the idea, it seems clear that the French and Spanish improved
upon it and gave it a plain
significance; and there is no reason
to doubt that cards were
actually employed to amuse Charles VI.
in his
melancholy and dejection.
The four suits of cards are
supposed to represent the four