have made capital. What is the crime of stealing a sheep, or
picking a pocket of a
handkerchief, when placed in comparison
with this crime, traced through all its consequences?
'With regard to those in the higher walks of life, experience
tells us it often leads to self-murder and duelling, about
gambling debts, which
terminate in the total ruin of families
once opulent, and reduce to beggary their
innocent and helpless
children; and as for those in a lower
sphere of life, when they
have lost their money, they often betake themselves to
housebreaking and the
highway, in order to
replenish their
coffers, and at last end their lives by the hand of justice.'
With many other most excellent observations on the
tendency of
this
selfish and avaricious vice, he concluded by sentencing
Miller to a fine of L500, one year's
imprisonment, and security
for his good behaviour for seven years, himself in L500 and two
others in L250 each, adding:--'It appeared that you played with
loaded dice. The Court has not taken that into consideration,
because it was not charged in the indictment.'
ATTACKS ON GAMING HOUSES.
In 1797 the Bedford Arms, Covent Garden, kept by one John
Twycross, was attacked, under
warrant. The gaming-room stood an
hour's siege, for the doors were so plated with iron that the
repeated blows of a sledge-hammer made no
impression on them.
The officers at length entered the back through the window. They
found fifteen persons at table, but not
actually playing, so no
conviction could take place.
In the same year a party of Bow Street officers searched a gaming
house at 19, Great Suffolk Street. They were an hour in
effecting their entrance. Two very stout doors,
strongly bolted
and barred, obstructed them. All the gamesters but one escaped
by a subterraneous passage, through a long range of cellars,
terminating at a house in Whitcomb Street,
whence their leader,
having the keys of every door, conducted them
safely into the
open air.
In the
previous year a party,
mostly French emigrants, were taken
at a house in Oxendon Street, with the table, cards, &c. A city
magistrate and a city officer had a
dispute at cards, and a
knock-down game ensued.
In 1799 the Marlborough Street officers apprehended at the gaming
house, No. 3, Leicester Square, thirteen out of twenty persons,
from the first floor, playing at Rouge et Noir. One of the
gamblers, when they first entered, threw up the sash, and,
stepping from the leads, fell into the area, and died in being
conveyed to the hospital.
In the same year, two
notorious gaming houses, Nos. 1 and 3,
King's Place, were attacked, by authority of a search
warrant.
All the paraphernalia of the
profession, as tables, dice,
counters, &c., were seized; but the inmates effected their escape
over the roofs of the adjoining houses. The
proprietor of No. 3
was smoked in a chimney, and three French emigrants intercepted
in their
retreat. On one of them was found a gold watch, which
appeared, by the robbery-book, to have been
stolen about five
years
previously. The banks had been conveyed away,--at least,
they were not among the captures.
'SOMETHING HONOURABLE TO THE BRITISH FLAG.'
It is stated as highly
honourable to the British flag that, among
the gamesters of the first quarter of the present century, no
Admirals were seen at the INFERIOR tables. Their proper pride
kept them from a familiar association with pursers, clerks,
grocers, horse-dealers, linen-drapers, silk-mercers, masons,
builders, timber-merchants, booksellers, &c., &c., and men of the
very lowest walks of life.
COARSE LANGUAGE OF GAMESTERS.
'I heard those who, in another place, even in the most polished
courts, would take a high rank for good
breeding and gentlemanly
education, at these tables make use of language which, I hope,
Billingsgate itself would turn from with
disgust. It cannot be
repeated; neither would it be believed, unless by such as, like
myself, have had "confirmation strong," too strong to be
rejected, if I did not, at the same time,
reject the evidence of
my senses.'[45]
[45] Seymour Harcourt, The Gaming Calendar.
BOASTED PROTECTION OF GREAT NAMES TO GAMING HOUSES.
'On one occasion I was at the Pigeon Hole, in St James's Square
(since removed to King Street), when the apprehensions which the
rapid sale of The Greeks (a work exposing the
system) excited
among the players were warmly debated. To my great astonishment,
a person who I
supposed was a
proprietor, boasted the
impenetrability of HIS house, and on what ground, think you?
Why, on that of it having the
countenance of the Lord Chief
Justice of England! True or false, it seemed to
revive the
flagging spirits of its visitors. They knew better. Not even
the warm feelings of a father would turn the scale of justice in
the even hand of Lord Ellenborough.'
It must not, however, be taken for granted, merely because these
fellows
assert it, that the sons of the late Chief Justice really
frequented that den of
iniquity. It is part of the
system of
these houses to delude the
ignorant, by pretending that this or
the other person uses their tables. I had an
instance of that
myself at ----, in Pall Mall. Asking who that gentleman was,
pointing to the party, I was answered--'That is Mr Hay, private
secretary to Lord Melville, the First Lord of the Admiralty.'
Now, I believe I may
safely say, and from my own knowledge, too,
that Mr Hay, whose
character and conduct is deservedly held in
the highest
estimation, NEVER was at that or any such house; yet
his name was
constantly quoted, and particularly to young
officers of the navy and marines, to whom his
acquaintance held
out hopes of future
advantage in their
profession![46]
[46] Id. ibid.
FORTUNATE RISE OF A CLUB-HOUSE WAITER.
'A
waitership at a club sometimes led to fortune. Thomas
Rumbold,
originally a
waiter at White's gaming club, got an
appointment in India, and suddenly rose to be Sir Thomas, and
Governor of Madras! On his return, with
immensewealth, a bill
of pains and penalties was brought into the House by Dundas, with
the view of stripping Sir Thomas of his ill-gotten gains. This
bill was
briskly pushed through the earlier stages; suddenly the
proceedings were arrested by adjournment, and the
measure fell to
the ground. The rumour of the day attributed Rumbold's escape to
the
corruptassistance of Rigby; who, in 1782, found himself, by
Lord North's
retirement, deprived of his place in the Pay Office,
and called upon to refund a large
amount of public moneys
un
accounted for. In this
strait, Rigby was believed to have had
recourse to Rumbold. Their
acquaintance had commenced in earlier
days, when Rigby was one of the boldest "punters" at White's, and
Rumbold bowed to him for half-crowns as
waiter. Rumbold is said
to have given Rigby a large sum of money, on condition of the
former being released from the
impending pains and penalties.
The truth of the report has been vehemently denied; but the
circumstances are
suspicious. The bill was dropped; Dundas, its
introducer, was Rigby's
intimateassociate. Rigby's
nephew and
heir soon after married Rumbold's daughter. Sir Thomas himself
had married a daughter of Dr Law, Bishop of Carlisle. The worthy
bishop stood godfather to one of Rumbold's children; the other
godfather was the Nabob of Arcot, and the child was christened
"Mahomet." So, at least, Walpole informs Mann.'[47]