cunctatio longa est.[15]
[15] Aelian, Var. Hist. lib. XLIV. c. xiii.; Juvenal, Sat. vi.
Tolomnius, King of the Veii, happened to be playing at dice when
the
arrival of Roman ambassadors was announced. At the very
instant he uttered the word KILL, a term of the game; the word
was misinterpreted by the hearers, and they went
forthwith and
massacred the ambassadors. Livy suggests that this was an excuse
alleged AFTER the
commission of the deed; but gamesters are
subject to such
absence of mind that there is really nothing
incredible or
astonishing in the act. 'Sire,' exclaimed a
messenger to the Caliph Alamin, 'it is no longer time for play--
Babylon is besieged!' 'Silence!' said the caliph, 'don't you see
I am on the point of giving checkmate?' The same story is told
of a Duke of Normandy.
Wars have
arisen from very
trivial causes--among the rest
gambling. Henry, the son of William the Conqueror, was playing
at chess with Louis, the son of Philip, King of France. The
latter, perceiving that he was losing the game got into a
passion, and
calling Henry the son of a
bastard, flung the chess-
board into his face. Henry took the chess-board and struck Louis
with it so
violently that he drew blood, and would have killed
him if his brother, who happened to come in, had not prevented
him. The two brothers took to
flight, but a great and lasting
war was the
consequence of the gambling fracas.
A gaming quarrel was the cause of the slap in the face given by
the Duc Rene to Louis XII., then only Duc d'Orleans. This slap
was the
origin of a ligue which was termed 'the mad war.' The
resentment of the outraged
prince was not appeased until he
mounted the
throne, when he uttered these
memorable words:--'A
King of France does not
avenge insults offered to a Duke of
Orleans.'
Many narratives of
suicide committed by
desperategamblers are on
record, some of which I now adduce.
SIR JOHN BLAND, OF KIPPAX PARK.
Sir John Bland, of Kippax Park, flirted away his whole fortune at
Hazard. 'He, t'other night,' says Walpole, 'exceeded what was
lost by the late Duke of Bedford, having at one period of the
night (though he recovered the greater part of it) lost two and
thirty thousand pounds.' Sir John Kippax shot himself in 1705.
LORD MOUNTFORD.
Lord Mountford came to a
tragic end through his gambling. He had
lost money; feared to be reduced to
distress; asked for a
government appointment, and determined to throw the die of life
or death on the answer received from court. The answer was
unfavourable. He consulted several persons,
indirectly at first,
afterwards pretty directly, on the easiest mode of finishing
life; invited a dinner-party for the day after; supped at
White's, and played at Whist till one o'clock of the New Year's
morning. Lord Robert Bertie drank to him 'a happy new year;' he
clapped his hand
strangely to his eyes. In the morning, he sent
for a
lawyer and three witnesses, executed his will, made them
read it over twice,
paragraph by
paragraph, asked the
lawyer if
that will would stand good though a man were to shoot himself.
Being
assured it would, he said--'Pray stay, while I step into
the next room;' went into the next room and shot himself, placing
the
muzzle of the
pistol so close to his head that the report was
not heard.
A SUICIDE ROBBING PETER TO PAY PAUL.
Gamblers have been known to set as
coolly and
deliberately about
blowing out their brains as if they had only been going to light
their cigars. Lord Orford, in his
correspondence with Horace
Walpole, mentions two curious instances.
One of the
fashionable young men of Lord Orford's day had been
unhappily decoyed into a gambling house, where his
passion for
play became so great that he spent nearly the whole of his time
in throwing the dice. He continued to
gamble until he had not
only lost a
princely fortune, but had incurred a large
amount of
debt among his tradesmen. With the loss of his money, and the
utter beggary which stared him in the face, the
unfortunate