else we must
evolve a new attitude toward this new
phenomena. It
is human nature to do the latter. Therefore the native has not
abandoned his old gods; nor has he adopted a new. He still
believes
firmly that his way is the best way of doing things, but
he acknowledges the Superman.
To the Superman, with all races, anything is possible. Only our
Superman is an idea, and ideal. The native has his Superman
before him in the
actual flesh.
We will suppose that our own Superman has appeared among us,
accomplishing things that apparantly contravene all our
established tenets of skill, of
intellect, of
possibility. It
will be
readily acknowledged that such an individual would at
first create some
astonishment. He wanders into a
crowded hotel
lobby, let us say,
evidently with the desire of going to the bar.
Instead of pushing laboriously through the crowd, he floats just
above their heads, gets his drink, and floats out again! That is
levitation, and is probably just as simple to him as
striking a
match is to you and me. After we get
thoroughly accustomed to him
and his life, we are no longer
vastly astonished, though always
interested, at the various manifestations of his extraordinary
powers. We go right along using the marvellous wireless,
aeroplanes, motor cars,
constructive machinery, and the like that
make us confident-justly, of course-in that we are about the
smartest lot of people on earth. And if we see red, white, and
blue
streamers of light crossing the
zenith at noon, we do not
manifest any very
profoundamazement. "There's that confounded
Superman again," we
mutter, if we happen to be busy. "I wonder
what stunt he's going to do now!"
A
consideration of the above beautiful fable may go a little way
toward explaining the
supposed native stolidity in the face of
the white man's wonders. A few years ago some misguided person
brought a
balloon to Nairobi. The
balloon interested the white
people a lot, but everybody was
chiefly occupied wondering what
the natives would do when they saw THAT! The natives did not do
anything. They gathered in large numbers, and most interestedly
watched it go up, and then went home again. But they were not
stricken with wonder to any great
extent. So also with
locomotives, motor cars, telephones, phonographs-any of our
modern ingenuities. The native is pleased and entertained, but
not astonished. "Stupid creature, no imagination," say we,
because our pride in showing off is a wee bit hurt.
Why should he be astonished? His
mental revolution took place
when he saw the first match struck. It is
manifestly impossible
for any one to make fire instantaneously by rubbing one small
stick. When for the first time he saw it done, he was indeed
vastly astounded. The immutable had been changed. The law had
been transcended. The impossible had been
accomplished. And then,
as
logicalsequence, his mind completed the syllogism. If the
white man can do this im
possibility, why not all the rest? To
defy the laws of nature by flying in the air or forcing great
masses of iron to
transport one, is no more wonderful than to
defy them by
striking a light. Since the white man can provedly
do one, what
earthly reason exists why he should not do anything
else that hits his fancy? There is nothing to get astonished at.
This does not
necessarily mean that the native looks on the white
man as a god. On the
contrary, your African is very
shrewd in the
reading of
character. But indubitably white men possess great
magic,
uncertain in its
extent.
That is as far as I should care to go, without much deeper
acquaintance, into the attitude of the native mind toward the
whites. A
superficial study of it, beyond the general principals
I have enunciated, discloses many strange contradictions. The
native respects the white man's
warlike skill, he respects his
physicalprowess, he certainly acknowledges tacitly his moral
superiority in the right to command. In case of
dispute he likes
the white man's adjudication; in case of
illness the man's
medicine; in case of trouble the white man's sustaining hand. Yet
he almost never attempts to copy the white man's appearance or
ways of doing things. His own
savage customs and habits he
fulfils with as much pride as ever in their
eternalfitness. Once
I was badgering Memba Sasa, asking him whether he thought the
white skin or the black skin the more orna
mental. "You are not
white," he retorted at last. "That," pointing to a leaf of my
notebook, "is white. You are red. I do not like the looks of red
people."
They call our speech the "snake language," because of its hissing
sound. Once this is brought to your attention, indeed, you cannot
help noticing the superabundance of the sibilants.
A queer melange the pigeonholes of an African's brain must
contain-fear and respect,
strongly mingled with clear estimate
of intrinsic
character of individuals and a
satisfaction with his
own standards.
Nor, I think, do we realize
sufficiently the
actual funda
mentaldifferences between the African and our peoples. Physically they
must be in many ways as
different from our selves as though they
actually belonged to a
different
species. The Masai are a fine
big race,
enduring, well developed and
efficient. They live
exclusively on cow's milk mixed with blood; no meat, no fruit, no
vegetables, no grain; just that and nothing more. Obviously they
must
differ from us most radically, or else all our dietetic
theories are wrong. It is a
well-known fact that any native
requires a
triple dose of white man's medicine. Furthermore a
native's sensitiveness to pain is very much less than the white
man's. This is indubitable. For example, the Wakamba file-or,
rather, chip, by means of a small chisel-all their front teeth
down to
needle points, When these happen to fall out, the warrior
substitutes an
artificial tooth which he drives down into the
socket. If the
savage got the same effects from such a
performance that a white man's
dentalsystem would
arouse, even
"
savage stoicism" would hardly do him much good. There is nothing
to be gained by multiplying examples. Every African traveller can
recall a thousand.
Inci
dentally, and by the way, I want to add to the milk-and-blood
joke on dietetics another on the
physical culturists. We are all
familiar with the wails over the loss of our toe nails. You know
what I mean; they run somewhat like this: shoes are the curse of
civilization; if we wear them much longer we shall not only lose
the intended use of our feet, but we shall lose our toe nails as
well; the
savage man, etc. , etc. , etc. Now I saw a great many of
said
savage men in Africa, and I got much interested in their toe
nails, because I soon found that our own
civilized "imprisoned"
toe nails were very much better developed. In fact, a large
number of the free and untramelled
savages have hardly any toe
nails at all! Whether this upsets a theory, nullifies a
senti
mental protest, or merely stands as an
exception, I should
not dare guess. But the fact is indubitable.
XVIII. IN THE JUNGLE (a) THE MARCH TO MERU
Now, one day we left the Isiola River and cut across on a long
upward slant to the left. In a very short time we had left the
plains, and were adrift in an ocean of brown grass that concealed
all but the bobbing loads atop the safari, and over which we
could only see when mounted. It was
glorious feed,
apparently,
but it contained very few animals for all that. An animal could
without doubt wax fat and sleek
therein: but only to furnish
light and salutary meals to beasts of prey. Long grass makes easy
stalking. We saw a few ostriches, some giraffe, and three or four
singly
adventurous oryx. The ripening grasses were softer than a
rippling field grain; and even more beautiful in their umber and
browns. Although
apparently we travelled a level,
nevertheless in
the
extreme distance the plains of our
hunting were dropping
below, and the far off mountains were slowly rising above the
horizon. On the other side were two very green hills, looking
nearly straight up and down, and through a cleft the splintered
snow-clad
summit of Mt. Kenia.
At length this gentle foothill slope broke over into rougher