accuracy. In spite of careful cleaning the
barrel was in several
places
slightly corroded. For this the
climate was responsible.
The few small pittings, however, did not seem in any way to have
affected the
accuracy, as the rifle shot the following groups:
3-1/2 inches at 200 yards; 7-1/4 inches at 300 yards; and
11-1/2 inches at 500 yards.*
*It shot one five-shot 1-2/3 inch group at 200 yds., and several
others at all distances less than the figures given, but I am
convinced these must have been largely accidental.
These groups were not made from a machine rest, however; as none
was
available. The complete record with this arm for my whole
stay in Africa was 307 hits out of 395 cartridges fired,
representing 185 head of game killed. Most of this shooting was
for meat and represented also all sorts of "varmints" as well.
The 405 Winchester. This
weapon was sighted like the Springfield,
and was
constantly in the field as my second gun. For lions it
could not be
beaten; as it was very
accurate, delivered a hard
blow, and held five cartridges. Beyond 125 to 150 yards one had
to begin to guess at distance, so for ordinary shooting I
preferred the Springfield. In thick brush country, however, where
one was likely to come suddenly on rhinoceroes, but where one
wanted to be ready always for
desirable smaller game, the
Winchester was just the thing. It was short, handy, and reliable.
One experience with a zebra 300-350 yards has made me question
whether at long (hunting) ranges the remaining
velocity of the
big blunt nosed
bullet is not
seriously reduced; but as to that I
have not enough data for a final
conclusion. I have no doubt,
however, that at such ranges, and beyond, the little Springfield
has more
shocking power. Of course at closer ranges the
Winchester is by far the more powerful. I killed one rhinoceros
with the 405, one
buffalo and one hippo; but should consider it
too light for an
emergency gun against the larger dangerous
animals, such as
buffalo and rhinoceros. If one has time for
extreme
accuracy, and can pick the shot, it is plenty big; but I
refer now to close quarters in a hurry. I had no trouble whatever
with the
mechanism of this arm; nor have I ever had trouble with
any of the lever actions, although I have used them for many
years. As regards speed of fire the
controversy between the lever
and bolt action advocates seems to me foolish in the extreme.
Either action can be fired faster than it should be fired in the
presence of game. It is my
belief that any man, no matter how
practised or how cool, can stampede himself beyond his best
accuracy by pumping out his shots too rapidly. This is especially
true in the face of charging dangerous game. So
firmly do I
believe this that I generally take the rifle from my shoulder
between each shot. Even aimed rapid fire is of no great value as
compared with better aimed slower fire. The first
bullet delivers
to an animal's
nervoussystem about all the shock it can absorb.
If the beast is not
thereby knocked down and held down,
subsequent shots can accomplish that
desirable result only by
reaching a vital spot or by tearing
tissue. As an example of this
I might
instance a waterbuck into which I saw my
companion empty
five heavy 465 and double 500
bullets from cordite rifles before
it fell! Thus if the game gets to its feet after the first shock,
it is true that the
hunter will often empty into it six or seven
more
bullets without
apparent result, unless he aims carefully
for a centrally vital point. It follows that
therefore a second
shot aimed with enough care to land it in that point is worth a
lot more than a half dozen delivered in three or four seconds
with only the
accuracy necessary to group decently at very short
range, even if all of them hit the beast. I am
perfectly aware
that this view will probably be disputed; but it is the result of
considerable experience, close
observation and real interest in
the game. The whole record of the Winchester was 56 hits out of
70 cartridges fired; representing 27 head of game.
The 465 Holland & Holland double cordite rifle. This beautiful
weapon, built and balanced like a fine hammerless shotgun, was
fitted with open sights. It was of course
essentially a close
range
emergency gun, but was
capable of
accurate work at a
distance. I killed one
buffalo dead with it, across a wide canyon,
with the 300-yard leaf up on the back sight. Its game list
however was
limited to rhinoceroses, hippopotamuses,
buffaloes
and crocodiles. The
recoil in spite of its weight of twelve and
one half pounds, was
tremendous; but unnoticeable when I was
shooting at any of these brutes. Its total record was 31
cartridges fired with 29 hits representing 13 head of game.
The conditions militating against marksmanship are often severe.
Hard work in the tropics is not the most steadying
regime in the
world, and outside a man's nerves, he is often bothered by queer
lights, and the effects of the mirage that swirls from the
sun-heated plain. The ranges, too, are rather long. I took the
trouble to pace out about every kill, and find that
antelope in the
plains averaged 245 yards; with a
maximum of 638 yards, while
antelope in covered country averaged 148 yards, with a
maximum of
311.
APPENDIX IV. THE AMERICAN IN AFRICA
IN WHICH HE APPEARS AS DIFFERENT FROM THE ENGLISHMAN
It is always interesting to play the other fellow's game his way,
and then, in light of experience, to see
wherein our way and his
way modify each other.
The above
proposition here refers to camping. We do considerable
of it in our country, especially in our North and West. After we
have been at it for some time, we
evolve a method of our own. The
basis of that method is to do without; to GO LIGHT. At first even
the best of us will carry too much
plunder, but ten years of
philosophy and rainstorms, trails and trials, will bring us to an
irreducible
minimum. A party of three will get along with two
pack horses, say; or, on a harder trip, each will carry the
necessities on his own back. To take just as little as is
consistent with comfort is to play the game skilfully. Any
article must pay in use for its transportation.
With this ideal deeply ingrained by the test of experience, the
American camper is appalled by the
caravan his British cousins
consider necessary for a trip into the African back country. His
said cousin has, perhaps, very kindly offered to have his outfit
ready for him when he arrives. He does arrive to find from one
hundred to one hundred and fifty men gathered as his personal
attendants.
"Great Scot!" he cries, "I want to go camping; I don't want to
invade anybody's territory. Why the army?"
He discovers that these are porters, to carry his effects.
"What effects?" he demands, bewildered. As far as he knows, he
has two guns, some
ammunition, and a black tin box, bought in
London, and half-filled with extra clothes, a few medicines, a
thermometer, and some little personal knick-knacks. He has been
wondering what else he is going to put in to keep things from
rattling about. Of course he expected besides these to take along
a little plain grub, and some blankets, and a frying pan and
kettle or so.
The English friend has known several Americans, so he explains
patiently.
"I know this seems foolish to you," he says, "but you must
remember you are under the
equator and you must do things
differently here. As long as you keep fit you are safe; but if