V.
Something should be said of Whitman's style, for style is of
the
essence of thinking. And where a man is so critically
deliberate as our author, and goes
solemnly about his
poetryfor an ulterior end, every
indication is worth notice. He
has chosen a rough, unrhymed, lyrical verse; sometimes
instinct with a fine processional
movement; often so rugged
and
careless that it can only be described by
saying that he
has not taken the trouble to write prose. I believe myself
that it was selected
principally because it was easy to
write, although not without recollections of the marching
measures of some of the prose in our English Old Testament.
According to Whitman, on the other hand, "the time has
arrived to
essentially break down the barriers of form
between Prose and Poetry . . . for the most cogent purposes
of those great
inland states, and for Texas, and California,
and Oregon;" - a statement which is among the happiest
achievements of American
humour. He calls his verses
"recitatives," in easily followed
allusion to a
musical form.
"Easily-written, loose-fingered chords," he cries, "I feel
the thrum of your
climax and close." Too often, I fear, he
is the only one who can
perceive the
rhythm; and in spite of
Mr. Swinburne, a great part of his work considered as verses
is poor bald stuff. Considered, not as verse, but as speech,
a great part of it is full of strange and
admirable merits.
The right detail is seized; the right word, bold and
trenchant, is
thrust into its place. Whitman has small
regard to
literary decencies, and is
totally free from
literary timidities. He is neither afraid of being slangy
nor of being dull; nor, let me add, of being
ridiculous. The
result is a most
surprisingcompound of plain grandeur,
sentimental affectation, and
downrightnonsense. It would be
useless to follow his detractors and give instances of how
bad he can be at his worst; and perhaps it would be not much
wiser to give extracted specimens of how happily he can write
when he is at his best. These come in to most
advantage in
their own place; owing something, it may be, to the
offset of
their curious surroundings. And one thing is certain, that
no one can
appreciate Whitman's excellences until he has
grown accustomed to his faults. Until you are content to
pick
poetry out of his pages almost as you must pick it out
of a Greek play in Bohn's
translation, your
gravity will be
continually upset, your ears perpetually disappointed, and
the whole book will be no more to you than a particularly
flagrant production by the Poet Close.
A
writer of this
uncertain quality was, perhaps, unfortunate
in
taking for thesis the beauty of the world as it now is,
not only on the hill-tops but in the factory; not only by the
harbour full of
stately ships, but in the magazine of the
hopelessly prosaic hatter. To show beauty in common things
is the work of the rarest tact. It is not to be done by the
wishing. It is easy to posit as a theory, but to bring it
home to men's minds is the problem of
literature, and is only
accomplished by rare
talent, and in
comparatively rare
instances. To bid the whole world stand and deliver, with a
dogma in one's right hand by way of
pistol; to cover reams of
paper in a galloping, headstrong vein; to cry louder and
louder over everything as it comes up, and make no
distinction in one's
enthusiasm over the most incomparable
matters; to prove one's entire want of
sympathy for the
jaded,
literary palate, by
calling, not a spade a spade, but
a hatter a hatter, in a lyrical apostrophe; - this, in spite
of all the airs of
inspiration, is not the way to do it. It
may be very wrong, and very wounding to a
respectable branch
of industry, but the word "hatter" cannot be used seriously
in
emotional verse; not to understand this, is to have no
literary tact; and I would, for his own sake, that this were