inextinguishable youth, of
running waters, as
applied to Mr. Henry
James's
inspiration, may be dropped. In its
volume and force the
body of his work may be compared rather to a
majestic river. All
creative art is magic, is evocation of the
unseen in forms
persuasive, enlightening, familiar and
surprising, for the
edification of mankind, pinned down by the conditions of its
existence to the
earnestconsideration of the most insignificant
tides of
reality.
Action in its
essence, the
creative art of a
writer of
fiction may
be compared to
rescue work carried out in darkness against cross
gusts of wind swaying the action of a great
multitude. It is
rescue work, this snatching of vanishing phases of turbulence,
disguised in fair words, out of the native
obscurity into a light
where the struggling forms may be seen, seized upon, endowed with
the only possible form of permanence in this world of
relativevalues--the permanence of memory. And the
multitude feels it
obscurely too; since the demand of the individual to the artist is,
in effect, the cry, "Take me out of myself!" meaning really, out of
my perishable activity into the light of imperishable
consciousness. But everything is
relative, and the light of
consciousness is only
enduring, merely the most
enduring of the
things of this earth, imperishable only as against the short-lived
work of our
industrious hands.
When the last aqueduct shall have crumbled to pieces, the last
airship fallen to the ground, the last blade of grass have died
upon a dying earth, man,
indomitable by his training in resistance
to
misery and pain, shall set this undiminished light of his eyes
against the
feeble glow of the sun. The
artisticfaculty, of which
each of us has a minute grain, may find its voice in some
individual of that last group,
gifted with a power of expression
and
courageous enough to interpret the
ultimate experience of
mankind in terms of his
temperament" target="_blank" title="n.气质;性格">
temperament, in terms of art. I do not
mean to say that he would attempt to
beguile the last moments of
humanity by an
ingenious tale. It would be too much to expect--
from
humanity. I doubt the
heroism of the hearers. As to the
heroism of the artist, no doubt is necessary. There would be on
his part no
heroism. The artist in his
calling of interpreter
creates (the clearest form of demonstration) because he must. He
is so much of a voice that, for him, silence is like death; and the
postulate was, that there is a group alive, clustered on his
threshold to watch the last
flicker of light on a black sky, to
hear the last word uttered in the stilled
workshop of the earth.
It is safe to
affirm that, if anybody, it will be the imaginative
man who would be moved to speak on the eve of that day without to-
morrow--whether in
austereexhortation or in a
phrase of sardonic
comment, who can guess?
For my own part, from a short and cursory
acquaintance with my
kind, I am inclined to think that the last
utterance will
formulate, strange as it may appear, some hope now to us utterly
in
conceivable. For mankind is
delightful in its pride, its
assurance, and its
indomitable tenacity. It will sleep on the
battlefield among its own dead, in the manner of an army having won
a
barrenvictory. It will not know when it is
beaten. And perhaps
it is right in that quality. The victories are not, perhaps, so
barren as it may appear from a
purely strategical, utilitarian
point of view. Mr. Henry James seems to hold that
belief. Nobody
has rendered better, perhaps, the tenacity of
temper, or known how
to drape the robe of
spiritual honour about the drooping form of a
victor in a
barrenstrife. And the honour is always well won; for
the struggles Mr. Henry James chronicles with such subtle and
direct
insight are, though only personal
contests,
desperate in
their silence, none the less
heroic (in the modern sense) for the
absence of shouted watchwords, clash of arms and sound of trumpets.
Those are adventures in which only choice souls are ever involved.
And Mr. Henry James records them with a
fearless and insistent
fidelity to the PERIPETIES of the
contest, and the feelings of the
combatants.
The fiercest excitements of a
romance DE CAPE ET D'EPEE, the
romance of yard-arm and boarding pike so dear to youth, whose
knowledge of action (as of other things) is
imperfect and limited,
are matched, for the quickening of our maturer years, by the tasks
set, by the difficulties presented, to the sense of truth, of
necessity--before all, of conduct--of Mr. Henry James's men and
women. His mankind is
delightful. It is
delightful in its
tenacity; it refuses to own itself
beaten; it will sleep on the
battlefield. These
warlike images come by themselves under the
pen; since from the duality of man's nature and the
competition of
individuals, the life-history of the earth must in the last
instance be a history of a really very
relentlesswarfare. Neither
his fellows, nor his gods, nor his passions will leave a man alone.
In
virtue of these
allies and enemies, he holds his precarious
dominion, he possesses his
fleetingsignificance; and it is this
relation in all its manifestations, great and little, superficial
or
profound, and this relation alone, that is commented upon,
interpreted, demonstrated by the art of the
novelist in the only
possible way in which the task can be performed: by the
independent
creation of circumstance and
character, achieved
against all the difficulties of expression, in an imaginative
effort
finding its
inspiration from the
reality of forms and
sensations. That a sacrifice must be made, that something has to
be given up, is the truth engraved in the innermost recesses of the
fair
temple built for our edification by the masters of
fiction.
There is no other secret behind the curtain. All adventure, all
love, every success is resumed in the
supremeenergy of an act of
renunciation. It is the
uttermost limit of our power; it is the
most
potent and
effective force at our
disposal on which rest the
labours of a
solitary man in his study, the rock on which have been
built commonwealths whose might casts a dwarfing shadow upon two
oceans. Like a natural force which is obscured as much as
illuminated by the multiplicity of
phenomena, the power of
renunciation is obscured by the mass of weaknesses, vacillations,
secondary motives and false steps and compromises which make up the
sum of our activity. But no man or woman
worthy of the name can
pretend to anything more, to anything greater. And Mr. Henry
James's men and women are
worthy of the name, within the limits his
art, so clear, so sure of itself, has drawn round their activities.
He would be the last to claim for them Titanic proportions. The
earth itself has grown smaller in the course of ages. But in every
sphere of human perplexities and emotions, there are more
greatnesses than one--not counting here the
greatness of the artist
himself. Wherever he stands, at the
beginning or the end of
things, a man has to sacrifice his gods to his passions, or his
passions to his gods. That is the problem, great enough, in all
truth, if approached in the spirit of
sincerity and knowledge.
In one of his
critical studies, published some fifteen years ago,
Mr. Henry James claims for the
novelist the
standing of the
historian as the only
adequate one, as for himself and before his
audience. I think that the claim cannot be
contested, and that the
position is unassailable. Fiction is history, human history, or it
is nothing. But it is also more than that; it stands on firmer
ground, being based on the
reality of forms and the
observation of
social
phenomena,
whereas history is based on documents, and the
reading of print and handwriting--on
second-handimpression. Thus
fiction is nearer truth. But let that pass. A
historian may be an
artist too, and a
novelist is a
historian, the preserver, the
keeper, the expounder, of human experience. As is meet for a man
of his
descent and
tradition, Mr. Henry James is the
historian of
fine
consciences.
Of course, this is a general statement; but I don't think its truth
will be, or can be questioned. Its fault is that it leaves so much
out; and, besides, Mr. Henry James is much too
considerable to be
put into the nutshell of a
phrase. The fact remains that he has
made his choice, and that his choice is justified up to the hilt by
the success of his art. He has taken for himself the greater part.
The range of a fine
conscience covers more good and evil than the
range of
conscience which may be called,
roughly, not fine; a
conscience, less troubled by the nice
discrimination of shades of
conduct. A fine
conscience is more
concerned with essentials; its
triumphs are more perfect, if less
profitable, in a
worldly sense.
There is, in short, more truth in its
working for a
historian to
detect and to show. It is a thing of
infinitecomplication and
suggestion. None of these escapes the art of Mr. Henry James. He
has mastered the country, his
domain, not wild indeed, but full of
romantic glimpses, of deep shadows and sunny places. There are no
secrets left within his range. He has disclosed them as they
should be disclosed--that is,
beautifully. And, indeed, ugliness
has but little place in this world of his
creation. Yet, it is
always felt in the truthfulness of his art; it is there, it
surrounds the scene, it presses close upon it. It is made
visible,