great many thousands of years. From
childhood to old age he
performs his every act in
accord with prohibitions and
requirements. He must remember them all; for
ignorance does not
divert consequences. He must observe them all; in pain of
terrible
punishments. For example, never may he
cultivate on the
site of a grave; and the plants that spring up from it must never
be cut.* He must make certain
complicated offerings before
venturing to
harvest a crop. On crossing the first
stream of a
journey he must touch his lips with the end of his wetted bow,
wade across, drop a stone on the far side, and then drink. If he
cuts his nails, he must throw the parings into a
thicket. If he
drink from a
stream, and also cross it, he must eject a mouthful
of water back into the
stream. He must be particularly careful
not to look his mother-in-law in the face. Hundreds of omens by
the manner of their
happening may modify actions, as, on what
side of the road a
woodpecker calls, or in which direction a hyena
or jackal crosses the path, how the ground hornbill flies or
alights, and the like. He must notice these things, and change
his plans
according to their
occurrence. If he does not notice
them, they exercise their influence just the same. This does not
encourage a distrait
mental attitude. Also it goes far to explain
otherwise unexplainable visitations. Truly, as Hobley says in his
unexcelled work on the A-Kamba, "the life of a
savage native is a
complex matter, and he is hedged round by all sorts of rules and
prohibitions, the infringement of which will probably cause his
death, if only by the
intensebelief he has in the rules which
guide his life."
*Customs are not
universal among the different tribes. I am
merely illustrating.
For these rules and customs he never attempts to give a reason.
They are; and that is all there is to it. A mere statement: "This
is the custom" settles the matter finally. There is no necessity,
nor passing thought even, of
finding any
logical cause. The
matter was worked out in the
mentalevolution of remote
ancestors. At that time, perhaps, insurgent and Standpatter,
Conservative and Radical fought out the questions of the day, and
the Muckrakers swung by their tails and chattered about it.
Those days are all long since over. The questions of the world
are settled forever. The people have passed through the struggles
of their formative period to the
ultimate highest
perfection of
adjustment to material and
spiritualenvironment of which they
were
capable under the influence of their original
racial force.
Parenthetically, it is now a question whether or not an added
impulse can be communicated from without. Such an
impulse must
(a) unsettle all the old
beliefs, (b)
inspire an era of
skepticism, (c) reintroduce the old struggle of ideas between the
Insurgent and the Standpatter, and Radical and the Conservative,
(d) in the
meantime furnish, from the older civilization,
materials, both in the thought-world and in the object-world, for
building slowly a new set of customs more closely approximating
those we are building for ourselves. This is a longer and slower
and more
complicated affair than teaching the native to wear
clothes and sing hymns; or to build houses and drink gin; but it
is what must be
accomplished step by step before the African
peoples are really
civilized. I,
personally, do not think it can
be done.
Now having, a hundred thousand years or so ago, worked out the
highest good of the human race,
according to them, what must they
say to themselves and what must their attitude be when the white
man has come and has unrolled his
carpet of wonderful tricks? The
dilemma is
evident. Either we, as black men, must admit that our
hundred-thousand-year-old ideas as to what constitutes the
highest type of human relation to
environment is all wrong, or