putting into operation quite as much as the laws against public-
house lotteries and skittles.'
No `extenuating circumstances,' however, can be admitted
respecting the
notorious racing lotteries, in spite of the small
figure of the tickets; nay this rather aggravates the danger,
being a
temptation to the
thoughtlessmultitude. One of these
lotteries, called the Deptford Spec., was not long ago suppressed
by the strong arm of the law; but others still exist under
different names. In one of these the law is thought to be evaded
by the sale of a number of photographs; in another, a chance of
winning on a horse is secured by the purchase of certain numbers
of a newspaper struggling into
existence; but the following is,
perhaps, the drollest phase of the evasion as yet attempted:
`Here is
wisdom. Let him that hath understanding _count the
number of the beast_.'--Rev., chap. xiii.
`NICKOLAS REX.--"LUCKY" BANQUETS.
`HIS SATANIC MAJESTY purposes
holding a
series of Banquets,
Levees, and DRAWING ROOMS at Pandemonium during the ensuing
autumn, to each of which about 10,000 of his
faithful disciples
will be invited. H. S. M. will, at those
drawing-rooms and
receptions, _NUMBER_ a lot of beasts, and
distribute a
series of
REWARDS, varying in value from L100 to 10_s_. of her Britannic
Majesty's money.
`Tickets One Shilling each,
application for which must be made
_BY LETTER_ to His S. Majesty's Chamberlain, &c. &c. The LAST
_DRAWING-ROOM_ of this season will be held a few days before the
Feast of the CROYDON STEEPLECHASES, &c. &c.
CHAPTER XIV.
THE LAWS AGAINST GAMING IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES.
1. ANCIENT ROME.
In ancient Rome all games of chance, with the
exception of five
which had relation to
bodilyvigour, were
absolutely prohibited
in public or private. The loser could not be sued for moneys
lost, and could recover what he might have paid, such right being
secured to his heirs against the heirs of the
winner, even after
the lapse of 30 years' prescription. During 50 years after the
loss, should the loser or his heirs
neglect their action, it was
open to any one that chose to
prosecute, and
chiefly to the
municipal authorities, the sum recovered to be expended in that
case for public purposes. No surety for the
payment of money for
gambling purposes was bound. The betting on
lawful games
was restricted to a certain
amount, beyond which the loser could
recover moneys paid, and could not be sued for the
amount. A
person in whose house gambling had taken place, if struck or
injured, or if robbed on the occasion thereof, was denied
redress; but offences of gamblers among themselves were
punishable. Blows or injuries might be inflicted on the gambling
house
keeper at any time and
anywhere without being penal as
against any person; but theft was not exempted from punishment,
unless committed at the time of gambling--and not by a gambler.
Children and freedmen could recover their losses as against their
parents and patrons.
Cicero, in his second Philippic, speaks of a
criminal process
(_publicum judicium_) then in force against gamblers.
The laws of ancient Rome were,
therefore, very stringent on this
subject, although, there can be no doubt, without much effect.
2. FRANCE.
At the time of the French Revolution
warlike games alone
conferred the right of action, restricted, however, in cases of
excessive losses; games of strength and skill generally were
lawful, but were considered as not giving any right of action;
games of mere chance were prohibited, but minors alone were
allowed to recover moneys lost.
By the present law of France no
judicial action is allowed for
gambling debts and wagers, except in the case of such games as