remember that, in the whole length and
breadth of his native
country, there was no building even distantly resembling it.
But it is not alone in
scenery and
architecture that we count
England foreign. The
constitution of society, the very pillars of
the empire, surprise and even pain us. The dull, neglected
peasant, sunk in matter,
insolent, gross and servile, makes a
startling
contrast with our own long-legged, long-headed,
thoughtful, Bible-quoting
ploughman. A week or two in such a place
as Suffolk leaves the Scotchman gasping. It seems
incredible that
within the boundaries of his own island a class should have been
thus forgotten. Even the educated and
intelligent, who hold our
own opinions and speak in our own words, yet seem to hold them with
a difference or, from another reason, and to speak on all things
with less interest and
conviction. The first shock of English
society is like a cold
plunge. It is possible that the Scot comes
looking for too much, and to be sure his first experiment will be
in the wrong direction. Yet surely his
complaint is grounded;
surely the speech of Englishmen is too often
lacking in generous
ardour, the better part of the man too often
withheld from the
social
commerce, and the
contact of mind with mind evaded as with
terror. A Scotch
peasant will talk more liberally out of his own
experience. He will not put you by with conversational counters
and small jests; he will give you the best of himself, like one
interested in life and man's chief end. A Scotchman is vain,
interested in himself and others, eager for
sympathy,
setting forth
his thoughts and experience in the best light. The egoism of the
Englishman is self-contained. He does not seek to proselytise. He
takes no interest in Scotland or the Scotch, and, what is the
unkindest cut of all, he does not care to justify his indifference.
Give him the wages of going on and being an Englishman, that is all
he asks; and in the
meantime, while you continue to
associate, he
would rather not be reminded of your baser
origin. Compared with
the grand, tree-like self-sufficiency of his
demeanour, the vanity
and
curiosity of the Scot seem
uneasy,
vulgar, and immodest. That
you should
continually try to establish human and serious
relations, that you should
actually feel an interest in John Bull,
and desire and invite a return of interest from him, may argue
something more awake and
lively in your mind, but it still puts you
in the attitude of a
suitor and a poor relation. Thus even the
lowest class of the educated English towers over a Scotchman by the
head and shoulders.
Different indeed is the
atmosphere in which Scotch and English
youth begin to look about them, come to themselves in life, and
gather up those first apprehensions which are the material of
future thought and, to a great
extent, the rule of future conduct.
I have been to school in both countries, and I found, in the boys
of the North, something at once rougher and more tender, at once
more reserve and more
expansion, a greater
habitual distance
chequered by glimpses of a nearer
intimacy, and on the whole wider
extremes of
temperament and sensibility. The boy of the South
seems more
wholesome, but less
thoughtful; he gives himself to
games as to a business, striving to excel, but is not readily
transported by
imagination; the type remains with me as
cleaner in
mind and body, more active, fonder of eating, endowed with a lesser
and a less
romantic sense of life and of the future, and more
immersed in present circumstances. And certainly, for one thing,
English boys are younger for their age. Sabbath
observance makes a
series of grim, and perhaps serviceable, pauses in the tenor of
Scotch
boyhood - days of great
stillness and
solitude for the
rebellious mind, when in the
dearth of books and play, and in the
intervals of studying the Shorter Catechism, the
intellect and
senses prey upon and test each other. The
typical English Sunday,
with the huge
midday dinner and the plethoric afternoon, leads
perhaps to different results. About the very
cradle of the Scot
there goes a hum of metaphysical
divinity; and the whole of two
divergent systems is summed up, not merely speciously, in the two
first questions of the rival catechisms, the English tritely
inquiring, "What is your name?" the Scottish
striking at the very
roots of life with, "What is the chief end of man?" and answering
nobly, if obscurely, "To
glorify God and to enjoy Him for ever." I
do not wish to make an idol of the Shorter Catechism; but the fact
of such a question being asked opens to us Scotch a great field of
speculation; and the fact that it is asked of all of us, from the
peer to the ploughboy, binds us more nearly together. No
Englishman of Byron's age,
character, and history would have had
patience for long
theological discussions on the way to fight for
Greece; but the daft Gordon blood and the Aberdonian school-days
kept their influence to the end. We have
spoken of the material
conditions; nor need much more be said of these: of the land lying
everywhere more exposed, of the wind always louder and bleaker, of
the black, roaring winters, of the gloom of high-lying, old stone
cities,
imminent on the windy seaboard; compared with the level
streets, the warm
colouring of the brick, the
domestic quaintness
of the
architecture, among which English children begin to grow up
and come to themselves in life. As the stage of the University
approaches, the
contrast becomes more express. The English lad
goes to Oxford or Cambridge; there, in an ideal world of gardens,
to lead a semi-scenic life,
costumed, disciplined and drilled by
proctors. Nor is this to be regarded merely as a stage of
education; it is a piece of
privilege besides, and a step that
separates him further from the bulk of his compatriots. At an
earlier age the Scottish lad begins his greatly different
experience of
crowded class-rooms, of a gaunt quadrangle, of a bell
hourly booming over the
traffic of the city to recall him from the
public-house where he has been lunching, or the streets where he
has been wandering fancy-free. His college life has little of
restraint, and nothing of necessary gentility. He will find no
quiet clique of the
exclusive, studious and cultured; no rotten
borough of the arts. All classes rub shoulders on the greasy
benches. The raffish young gentleman in gloves must
measure his
scholarship with the plain, clownish laddie from the
parish school.
They separate, at the session's end, one to smoke cigars about a
watering-place, the other to resume the labours of the field beside
his
peasant family. The first
muster of a college class in
Scotland is a scene of curious and
painful interest; so many lads,
fresh from the
heather, hang round the stove in cloddish
embarrassment, ruffled by the presence of their smarter comrades,
and afraid of the sound of their own
rustic voices. It was in
these early days, I think, that Professor Blackie won the
affectionof his pupils, putting these
uncouth, umbrageous students at their
ease with ready human geniality. Thus, at least, we have a healthy
democratic
atmosphere to breathe in while at work; even when there
is no cordiality there is always a juxtaposition of the different
classes, and in the
competition of study the
intellectual power of
each is
plainly demonstrated to the other. Our tasks ended, we of
the North go forth as freemen into the humming, lamplit city. At
five o'clock you may see the last of us hiving from the college
gates, in the glare of the shop windows, under the green
glimmer of
the winter
sunset. The frost tingles in our blood; no proctor lies
in wait to
intercept us; till the bell sounds again, we are the
masters of the world; and some
portion of our lives is always
Saturday, LA TREVE DE DIEU.
Nor must we omit the sense of the nature of his country and his
country's history gradually growing in the child's mind from story
and from
observation. A Scottish child hears much of shipwreck,
outlying iron skerries,
pitiless breakers, and great sea-lights;
much of
heathery mountains, wild clans, and hunted Covenanters.
Breaths come to him in song of the distant Cheviots and the ring of
foraying hoofs. He glories in his hard-fisted forefathers, of the
iron
girdle and the
handful of oat-meal, who rode so
swiftly and
lived so sparely on their raids. Poverty, ill-luck, enterprise,
and
constantresolution are the fibres of the legend of his
country's history. The heroes and kings of Scotland have been
tragically fated; the most marking incidents in Scottish history -
Flodden, Darien, or the Forty-five were still either failures or
defeats; and the fall of Wallace and the
repeated reverses of the
Bruce
combine with the very smallness of the country to teach
rather a moral than a material criterion for life. Britain is
altogether small, the mere
taproot of her
extended empire:
Scotland, again, which alone the Scottish boy adopts in his
imagination, is but a little part of that, and avowedly cold,
sterile and unpopulous. It is not so for nothing. I once seemed