the field-mouse, or shaped the
rhythmic tale of Tam o' Shanter. Not
only had life a zest for him incalculably stronger and subtler than
that which stirs the soul of Hodge, but he uttered it in word and
music such as go to the heart of mankind, and hold a magic power for
ages.
For some years there has been a great deal of talk about Art in our
country. It began, I
suspect, when the
veritableartistic impulse
of the Victorian time had flagged, when the
energy of a great time
was all but exhausted. Principles always become a matter of
vehement
discussion when practice is at ebb. Not by
taking thought
does one become an artist, or grow even an inch in that direction--
which is not at all the same as
saying that he who IS an artist
cannot profit by
conscious effort. Goethe (the example so often
urged by imitators
unlike him in every feature of humanity) took
thought enough about his Faust; but what of those youthtime lyrics,
not the least precious of his
achievements, which were scribbled as
fast as pen could go, thwartwise on the paper, because he could not
stop to set it straight? Dare I pen, even for my own eyes, the
venerable truth that an artist is born and not made? It seems not
superfluous, in times which have heard disdainful
criticism of
Scott, on the ground that he had no
artisticconscience, that he
scribbled without a thought of style, that he never elaborated his
scheme before beginning--as Flaubert, of course you know,
invariablydid. Why, after all, has one not heard that a certain William
Shakespeare turned out his
so-called works of art with something
like
criminalcarelessness? Is it not a fact that a bungler named
Cervantes was so little in
earnest about his Art that, having in one
chapter described the stealing of Sancho's
donkey, he
presently, in
mere
forgetfulness, shows us Sancho riding on Dapple, as if nothing
had happened? Does not one Thackeray shamelessly avow on the last
page of a grossly "subjective" novel that he had killed Lord
Farintosh's mother at one page and brought her to life again at
another? These sinners against Art are none the less among the
world's
supreme artists, for they LIVED, in a sense, in a degree,
unintelligible to these critics of
theirs, and their work is an
expression, satisfying and abiding, of the zest of life.
Some one, no doubt, hit upon this
definition of mine long ago. It
doesn't matter; is it the less original with me? Not long since I
should have fretted over the
possibility, for my living depended on
an avoidance of even
seeming plagiarism. Now I am at one with Lord
Foppington, and much disposed to take pleasure in the natural
sprouts of my own wit--without troubling whether the same idea has
occurred to others. Suppose me, in total
ignorance of Euclid, to
have discovered even the simplest of his geometrical demonstrations,
shall I be crestfallen when some one draws attention to the book?
These natural sprouts are, after all, the best products of our life;
it is a mere accident that they may have no value in the world's
market. One of my
conscious efforts, in these days of freedom, is
to live
intellectually for myself. Formerly, when in
reading I came
upon anything that impressed or
delighted me, down it went in my
note-book, for "use." I could not read a
striking verse, or
sentence of prose, without thinking of it as an apt
quotation in
something I might write--one of the evil results of a
literary life.
Now that I
strive to repel this habit of thought, I find myself
asking: To what end, then, do I read and remember? Surely as
foolish a question as ever man put to himself. You read for your
own pleasure, for your
solace and strengthening. Pleasure, then,
purely
selfish? Solace which endures for an hour, and strengthening
for no
combat? Ay, but I know, I know. With what heart should I
live here in my
cottage,
waiting for life's end, were it not for
those hours of
seeming idle
reading?
I think sometimes, how good it were had I some one by me to listen
when I am tempted to read a passage aloud. Yes, but is there any
mortal in the whole world upon whom I could
invariably depend for
sympathetic under
standing?--nay, who would even generally be at one
with me in my
appreciation. Such
harmony of intelligences is the
rarest thing. All through life we long for it: the desire drives
us, like a demon, into waste places; too often ends by plunging us
into mud and morass. And, after all, we learn that the
vision was
illusory. To every man is it decreed: thou shalt live alone.
Happy they who imagine that they have escaped the common lot; happy,
whilst they imagine it. Those to whom no such happiness has ever
been granted at least avoid the bitterest of disillusions. And is
it not always good to face a truth, however discomfortable? The
mind which renounces, once and for ever, a
futile hope, has its
compensation in ever-growing calm.
XXI
All about my garden to-day the birds are loud. To say that the air
is filled with their song gives no idea of the
ceaseless piping,
whistling, trilling, which at moments rings to heaven in a
triumphant
unison, a wild
accord. Now and then I notice one of the
smaller songsters who seems to
strain his
throat in a madly joyous
endeavour to out-carol all the rest. It is a
chorus of praise such
as none other of earth's children have the voice or the heart to
utter. As I listen, I am carried away by its
gloriousrapture; my
being melts in the
tenderness of an impassioned joy; my eyes are dim
with I know not what
profound humility.
XXII
Were one to look at the
literary journals only, and
thereafter judge
of the time, it would be easy to
persuade oneself that
civilizationhad indeed made great and solid progress, and that the world stood
at a very
hopeful stage of enlightenment. Week after week, I glance
over these pages of
crowdedadvertisement; I see a great many
publishing-houses zealously active in putting forth every kind of
book, new and old; I see names
innumerable of workers in every
branch of
literature. Much that is announced declares itself at
once of merely ephemeral
import, or even of no
import at all; but
what masses of print which invite the attention of
thoughtful or
studious folk! To the
multitude is offered a long
succession of
classic authors, in beautiful form, at a
minimum cost; never were
such treasures so cheaply and so
gracefully set before all who can
prize them. For the
wealthy, there are
volumes
magnificent; lordly
editions; works of art
whereon have been lavished care and skill and
expense incalculable. Here is exhibited the
learning of the whole
world and of all the ages; be a man's study what it will, in these
columns, at one time or another he shall find that which appeals to
him. Here are labours of the erudite, exercised on every subject
that falls within
learning's scope. Science brings forth its newest
discoveries in earth and heaven; it speaks to the
philosopher in his
solitude, and to the crowd in the market-place. Curious pursuits of
the mind at
leisure are represented in publications numberless;
trifles and oddities of
intellectualsavour; gatherings from every
byway of human interest. For other moods there are the fabulists;
to tell truth, they
commonly hold the place of honour in these
varied lists. Who shall count them? Who shall calculate their
readers? Builders of verse are many; yet the
observer will note
that
contemporary poets have but an inconspicuous
standing in this
index of the public taste. Travel, on the other hand, is largely
represented; the general
appetite for information about lands remote
would appear to be only less keen than for the ad
ventures of
romance.
With these pages before one's eyes, must one not needs believe that
things of the mind are a prime concern of our day? Who are the
purchasers of these
volumes ever pouring from the press? How is it
possible for so great a
commerce to
flourish save as a consequence
of national
eagerness in this
intellectualdomain? Surely one must
take for granted that throughout the land, in town and country,
private libraries are growing apace; that by the people at large a
great deal of time is
devoted to
reading; that
literaryambition is
one of the commonest spurs to effort?
It is the truth. All this may be said of
contemporary England. But
is it enough to set one's mind at ease
regarding the
outlook of our
civilization?
Two things must be remembered. However
considerable this
literarytraffic, regarded by itself, it is
relatively of small
extent. And,
in the second place,
literary activity is by no means an invariable
proof of that
mental attitude which marks the truly
civilized man.
Lay aside the "
literary organ," which appears once a week, and take
up the newspaper, which comes forth every day, morning and evening.
Here you get the true
proportion of things. Read your daily news-
sheet--that which costs threepence or that which costs a halfpenny--
and muse upon the
impression it leaves. It may be that a few books
are "noticed"; granting that the "notice" is in any way noticeable,
compare the space it occupies with that
devoted to the material
interests of life: you have a gauge of the real
importance of
intellectualendeavour to the people at large. No, the public which
reads, in any sense of the word worth
considering, is very, very