It was at the time of these campaigns that I was
elected Vice-President of the National Association
and Lecturer at Large, and the latter office brought
in its train a glittering
variety of experiences. On
one occasion an
episode occurred which ``Aunt
Susan'' never afterward wearied of describing.
There was a wreck somewhere on the road on which
I was to travel to meet a lecture
engagement, and
the trains going my way were not
running. Look-
ing up the track, however, I saw a train coming
from the opposite direction. I at once grasped my
hand-luggage and started for it.
``Wait! Wait!'' cried Miss Anthony. ``That
train's going the wrong way!''
``At least it's going SOMEWHERE!'' I replied, tersely,
as the train stopped, and I climbed the steps.
Looking back when the train had started again,
I saw ``Aunt Susan''
standing in the same spot on
the
platform and staring after it with incredulous
eyes; but I was right, for I discovered that by going
up into another state I could get a train which
would take me to my
destination in time for the
lecture that night. It was a fine
illustration of my
pet theory that if one intends to get somewhere it
is better to start, even in the wrong direction, than
to stand still.
Again and again in our work we had occasion to
marvel over men's lack of under
standing of the
views of women, even of those nearest and dearest to
them; and we had an especially
striking illustra-
tion of this at one of our
hearings in Washington.
A certain
distinguished gentleman (we will call him
Mr. H----) was chairman of the Judiciary, and after
we had said what we wished to say, he remarked:
``Your
arguments are
logical. Your cause is just.
The trouble is that women don't want
suffrage.
My wife doesn't want it. I don't know a single
woman who does want it.''
As it happened for this
unfortunate gentleman,
his wife was present at the
hearing and sitting beside
Miss Anthony. She listened to his words with sur-
prise, and then whispered to ``Aunt Susan'':
``How CAN he say that? _I_ want
suffrage, and I've
told him so a hundred times in the last twenty
years.''
``Tell him again NOW,'' urged Miss Anthony.
``Here's your chance to
impress it on his memory.''
``Here!'' gasped the wife. ``Oh, I wouldn't
dare.''
``Then may I tell him?''
``Why--yes! He can think what he pleases, but
he has no right to
publicly misrepresent me.''
The
assent, hesitatingly begun, finished on a sud-
den note of
firmness. Miss Anthony stood up.
``It may interest Mr. H----,'' she said, ``to know
that his wife DOES wish to vote, and that for twenty
years she has wished to vote, and has often told him
so, though he has
evidently forgotten it. She is
here beside me, and has just made this explana-
tion.''
Mr. H---- stammered and hesitated, and finally
decided to laugh. But there was no mirth in the
sound he made, and I am afraid his wife had a bad
quarter of an hour when they met a little later in
the
privacy of their home.
Among other duties that fell to my lot at this
period were numerous
suffragedebates with promi-
nent opponents of the Cause. I have already re-
ferred to the
debate in Kansas with Senator Ingalls.
Equaling this in importance was a bout with Dr.
Buckley, the
distinguished Methodist
debater, which
had been arranged for us at Chautauqua by Bishop
Vincent of the Methodist Church. The
bishop was
not a
believer in
suffrage, nor was he one of my
admirers. I had once aroused his ire by replying
to a
sermon he had delivered on ``God's Women,''
and by proving, to my own
satisfaction at least,
that the women he thought were God's women had
done very little,
whereas the work of the world had
been done by those he believed were not ``God's
Women.'' There was
considerable interest, there-
fore, in the Buckley-Shaw
debate he had arranged;
we all knew he expected Dr. Buckley to wipe out
that old score, and I was determined to make it as
difficult as possible for the
distinguished gentleman
to do so. We held the
debate on two succeeding
days, I
speaking one afternoon and Dr. Buckley
replying the following day. On the evening before
I spoke, however, Dr. Buckley made an indiscreet
remark, which, blown about Chautauqua on the
light
breeze of
gossip, was generally regarded as both
unchivalrous and unfair.
As the hall in which we were to speak was enor-
mous, he declared that one of two things would cer-
tainly happen. Either I would
scream in order to
be heard by my great
audience, or I would be un-
able to make myself heard at all. If I
screamed it
would be a powerful
argument against women as
public speakers; if I could not be heard, it would be
an even better
argument. In either case, he sum-
med up, I was doomed to
failure. Following out
this theory, he posted men in the
extreme rear of
the great hall on the day of my lecture, to report to
him whether my words reached them, while he him-
self
graciously occupied a front seat. Bishop Vin-
cent's antagonistic feeling was so strong, however,
that though, as the presiding officer of the occasion,
he introduced me to the
audience, he did not wait
to hear my speech, but immediately left the hall--
and this little slight added to the public's interest
in the
debate. It was felt that the two gentlemen
were not quite ``playing fair,'' and the champions
of the Cause were especially
enthusiastic in their
efforts to make up for these
failures in courtesy.
My friends turned out in force to hear the lecture,
and on the breast of every one of them flamed the
yellow bow that stood for
suffrage, giving to the
vast hall something of the effect of a field of yellow
tulips in full bloom.
When Dr. Buckley rose to reply the next day
these friends were again awaiting him with an equal-
ly
jocund display of the
suffrage color, and this did
not add to his serenity. During his remarks he
made the serious mistake of losing his
temper; and,
unfortunately for him, he directed his wrath toward
a very old man who had thoughtlessly applauded by
pounding on the floor with his cane when Dr.
Buckley quoted a point I had made. The doctor
leaned forward and shook his fist at him.
``Think she's right, do you?'' he asked.
``Yes,'' admitted the
venerable citizen, briskly,
though a little startled by the manner of the ques-
tion.
``Old man,'' shouted Dr. Buckley, ``I'll make you
take that back if you've got a grain of sense in your
head!''
The
insult cost him his
audience. When he
realized this he lost all his self-possession, and, as
the Buffalo Courier put it the next day, ``went up
and down the
platform raving like a Billingsgate
fishwife.'' He lost the
debate, and the supply of
yellow
ribbon left in the
surrounding counties was
purchased that night to be used in the
suffragecelebration that followed. My friends still refer to
the occasion as ``the day we wiped up the earth
with Dr. Buckley''; but I do not
deserve the im-
plied
tribute, for Dr. Buckley would have lost his
case without a word from me. What really gave
me some
satisfaction, however, was the respective
degree of
freshness with which he and I emerged
from our
combat. After my speech Miss Anthony
and I were given a
reception, and stood for hours
shaking hands with hundreds of men and women.
Later in the evening we had a dinner and another
reception, which,
lasting, as they did, until midnight,
kept us from our
repose. Dr. Buckley, poor gentle-
man, had to be taken to his hotel immediately after
his speech, given a hot bath, rubbed down, and put
tenderly to bed; and not even the sympathetic
heart of Susan B. Anthony yearned over him when
she heard of his exhaustion.
It was also at Chautauqua, by the way, though a
number of years earlier, that I had my much mis-
quoted
encounter with the
minister who deplored
the fashion I followed in those days of wearing my
hair short. This young man, who was rather a
pompous person, saw fit to take me to task at a
table where a number of us were dining together.
``Miss Shaw,'' he said,
abruptly, ``I have been
asked very often why you wear your hair short,
and I have not been able to explain. Of course''--
this kindly--'' I know there is some good reason. I
ventured to advance the theory that you have been
ill and that your hair has fallen out. Is that it?''
``No,'' I told him. ``There is a reason, as you
suggest. But it is not that one.''
``Then why--'' he insisted.
``I am rather
sensitive about it,'' I explained.
``I don't know that I care to discuss the subject.''
The young
minister looked pained. ``But among
friends--'' he protested.
``True,'' I conceded. ``Well, then, among friends,
I will admit
frankly that it is a birthmark. I was
born with short hair.''
That was the last time my short hair was criticized
in my presence, but the young
minister was right
in his
disapproval and I was wrong, as I subsequently
realized. A few years later I let my hair grow long,
for I had
learned that no woman in public life can
afford to make herself
conspicuous by any eccen-
tricity of dress or appearance. If she does so she
suffers for it herself, which may not
disturb her, and
to a greater or less degree she injures the cause she
represents, which should
disturb her very much.
XII
BUILDING A HOME
It is not generally known that the meeting of
the International Council of Women held in
Chicago during the World's Fair was suggested by
Miss Anthony, as was also the appointment of the
Exposition's ``Board of Lady Managers.'' ``Aunt