depend upon
bodily skill and effort, foot, horse, and chariot
races, and others of the like nature: the claim may be rejected
if the court considers it
excessive" target="_blank" title="a.过分的;极端的">
excessive; but moneys paid can never be
recovered unless on the ground of fraud. The keepers of gaming
houses, their managers or agents, are punishable with fine (100
to 6000 francs) and
imprisonment (two to six months), and may be
deprived of most of their civil rights.
3. PRUSSIA.
By the Prussian Code all games of chance, except when licensed by
the state, are prohibited. Gaming debts are not the subjects of
action; but moneys paid cannot be sued for by losers. Wagers
give a right of action when the stakes consist of cash in the
hands of a third person; they are void if the
winner had a
knowledge of the event, and concealed it. Moneys lent for
gambling or betting purposes, or to pay gambling or betting
debts, cannot be sued for. Gaming house keepers and gamblers are
punishable with fine; professed gamblers with
imprisonment.
Occasional cheating at play obliges to
compensation; professed
swindlers at play are punishable as for theft, and banished
afterwards. Moneys won from a
drunken man, if to a considerable
amount, must be returned, and a fine paid of equal value.
4. AUSTRIA.
In Austria no right of action is given either to the
winner or
the loser. All games of chance are prohibited except when
licensed by the state. Cheating at play is punished with
imprisonment, according to the
amount of fraudulent gain.
Playing at un
lawful games, or allowing such to take place in
one's house, subjects the party to a heavy fine, or in default,
to
imprisonment.
5. ITALY.
The
provisions of the Sardinian Civil Code are similar to those
of the French, giving an action for moneys won at games of
strength or skill--when not
excessive" target="_blank" title="a.过分的;极端的">
excessive in
amount; but not
allowing the
recovery of moneys lost, except on the ground of
fraud or _MINORITY_, a
provision taken from the _OLD_ French
law.
6. BAVARIA.
By the Bavarian Code games of skill, and of mixed skill and
chance, are not
forbidden. The loser cannot refuse to pay, nor
can he recover his losses, provided the sport be honestly
conducted, and the stakes not
excessive" target="_blank" title="a.过分的;极端的">
excessive, having regard to the
rank,
character, and fortune of the parties. In cases of
fraudulent and
excessive" target="_blank" title="a.过分的;极端的">
excessive gaming, and in all games of mere chance,
the
winner cannot claim his
winnings, but must repay the loser on
demand. In the two latter cases (apparently) both
winner and
loser are
liable to a fine, equal in
amount,--for the first time
of
conviction, to one-third of the stakes; for the second time,
to two-thirds; and for the third time, to the whole: in certain
cases the bank is to be confiscated. Hotel and coffee-house
keepers, &c., who allow gambling on their premises, are punished
for the first offence by a fine of 50 florins; for the second,
with one of 100 florins; for the third, with the loss of the
license. The
punishment of private persons for the like
offence is left to the
discretion of the judge. _UNLAWFUL_
games may be _LEGALIZED_ by authority; but in such case, fraud
or gross
excess disables the
winner from claiming moneys won,
renders him
liable to repayment, and subjects him to arbitrary
punishment. _IMMORAL_ wagers are void; and _EXCESSIVE_ wagers
are to be reduced in
amount. Betting on
indifferent things is
not prohibited, nor even as to a known and certain thing--when
there is no
deception. No wager is void on
account of mere
disparity of odds. Professed gamblers, who also cheat at play,
and their accomplices, and the setters-up and collectors of
fictitious lotteries, are subject to
imprisonment, with hard
labour, for a term of from four to eight years.
Although,
therefore, cheating gamblers are
liable to
punishmentin Bavaria, it is
evident that gambling is there tolerated to the
utmost
extent required by the votaries of Fortune.
7. SPAIN.
Wagers appear to be
lawful in Spain, when not in themselves
fraudulent, or relating to anything
illegal or immoral.
8. ENGLAND.
In England some of the forms of gambling or gaming have been
absolutely
forbidden under heavy penalties,
whilst others have
been tolerated, but at the same time discouraged; and the reasons
for the
prohibition were not always directed against the
impropriety or
iniquity of the practice in itself;--thus it was
alleged in an Act passed in 1541, that for the sake of the games
the people neglected to
practise _ARCHERY_, through which
England had become great--`to the terrible dread and fear of all
strange nations.'
The first of the strictly-called Gaming Acts is one of Charles
II.'s reign, which was intended to check the habit of gambling so
prevalent then, as before stated. By this Act it was ordered
that, if any one shall play at any pastime or game, by gaming or
betting with those who game, and shall lose more than one hundred
pounds on credit, he shall not be bound to pay, and any contract
to do so shall be void. In
consequence of this Act losers of a
less
amount--whether less
wealthy or less profligate--and the
whole of the poorer classes, remained unprotected from the
cheating of sharpers, for it must be presumed that nobody has a
right to refuse to pay a fair gambling debt, since he would
evidently be glad to receive his
winnings. No doubt much misery
followed through the contrivances of sharpers; still it was a
salutary
warning to gamesters of the poorer classes--
whilst in
the higher ranks the `honour' of play was
equally stringent, and,
I may add, in many cases ruinous. By the
recital of the Act it
is
evident that the object was to check and put down gaming as a
business
profession, `to gain a living;' and
therefore it
specially mulcted the class out of which `adventurers' in this
line usually arise.
The Act of Queen Anne, by its
sweepingcharacter, shows that
gaming had become very virulent, for by it not only were all
securities for money lost at gaming void, but money
actuallypaid, if more than L10, might be recovered in an action at
law; not only might this be done, within three months, by the
loser himself, but by any one else--together with
treble the
value--half for himself, and half for the poor of the parish.
Persons
winning, by fraudulent means, L10 and
upwards at any
game were condemned by this Act to pay five times the
amountor value of the thing won, and,
moreover, they were to `be deemed
infamous, and suffer such
corporalpunishment as in cases of
wilful perjury.' The Act went further:--if persons were
suspected of getting their living by gaming, they might be
summoned before a magistrate, required to show that the greater
portion of their
income did not depend upon gaming, and to find
sureties for their good behaviour during twelve months, or be
committed to gaol.
There were, besides, two curious
provisions;-- any one assaulting
or challenging another to a duel on
account of disputes over
gaming, should
forfeit all his goods and be imprisoned for two
years;
secondly, the royal palaces of St James's and Whitehall
were exempted from the operation of this
statute, so long as the
sovereign was
actuallyresident within them--which last clause
probably showed that the entire Draconian
enactment was but a
farce. It is quite certain that it was inoperative, and that it