but let us see what can be said for the tight
corsetbinding the waist.
So far from being comfortable it must be most inconvenient,
a sort of
perpetualpenance and it is certainly
injurious to the health.
I feel
confident that physicians will support me in my belief
that the death-rate among American women would be less
if
corset and other tight lacing were abolished. I have known of instances
where tight lacing for the ballroom has caused the death of enceinte women.
As to the third object,
decency, I am not convinced that the American dress
fulfils this object. When I say American dress, I include also
the clothing worn by Europeans for both are practically the same.
It may be a matter of education, but from the Oriental point of view
we would prefer that ladies' dresses should be worn more loosely,
so that the figure should be less
prominent. I am aware that this is a view
which my American friends do not share. It is very curious
that what is considered as indecent in one country is thought to be
quite proper in another. During the hot summers in the Province of Kiangsu
the
working women avoid the inconveniences and chills of perspiration
by going about their work with nothing on the upper part of their bodies,
except a chest
protector to cover the breasts; in Western countries
women would never think of doing this, even during a season of
extreme heat;
yet they do not object, even in the depth of winter,
to uncovering their shoulders as low as possible when attending
a dinner-party, a ball, or the theater. I remember the case
of a Chinese rice-pounder in Hongkong who was arrested
and taken to the Police Court on a
charge of in
decency.
To
enable him to do his work better he had dispensed with all his clothing
excepting a loin cloth; for this he was sentenced to pay a fine of $2,
or, in default of
payment to be imprisoned for a week.
The English Magistrate, in
imposing the fine, lectured him severely,
remarking that in a
civilizedcommunity such
primitive manners
could not be tolerated, as they were both
barbarous and indecent.
When he said this did he think of the way the women of his country dress
when they go to a ball?
It must be remembered that
modesty is
wholly a matter
of conventionality and custom. Competent
observers have testified
that savages who have been accustomed to nudity all their lives
are covered with shame when made to put on clothing for the first time.
They
exhibit as much
confusion as a
civilized person would
if compelled to strip naked in public. In the words of a
competent authority
on this subject: "The facts appear to prove that the feeling of shame,
far from being the cause of man's covering his body is, on the contrary,
a result of this custom; and that the covering, if not used
as a
protection from the
climate, owes its
origin, at least in many cases,
to the desire of men and women to make themselves attractive."
Strange as it may seem, it is
nevertheless true, that a figure
partially clad
appears more indecent than one that is
perfectly nude.
The fourth object of clothes is
ornament, but
ornaments should be harmless,
not only to the wearer, but also to other people; yet from
the following
paragraph, copied from one of the daily newspapers,
it does not appear that they are.
"London, May 7. The death of a girl from blood-poisoning caused by a hatpin
penetrating her nose was inquired into at Stockport, Cheshire, yesterday.
The deceased was Mary Elizabeth Thornton, aged twenty-four, daughter of
a Stockport
tradesman. The father said that on Saturday evening, April 20,
his daughter was
speaking to a friend, Mrs. Pickford, outside the shop.
On the following Monday she complained of her nose being sore.
Next day she again complained and said, "It must be the hatpin."
While talking to Mrs. Pickford, she explained, Mrs. Pickford's baby
stumbled on the footpath. They both stooped to pick it up,