form I claim that
indulgence to which all
sinners against
themselves are entitled.
J. C.
1920.
PART I--LETTERS
BOOKS--1905.
I.
"I have not read this author's books, and if I have read them I
have forgotten what they were about."
These words are reported as having been uttered in our midst not a
hundred years ago,
publicly, from the seat of justice, by a civic
magistrate. The words of our
municipal rulers have a
solemnity and
importance far above the words of other mortals, because our
municipal rulers more than any other
variety of our governors and
masters represent the average
wisdom,
temperament" target="_blank" title="n.气质;性格">
temperament, sense and virtue
of the
community. This generalisation, it ought to be promptly
said in the interests of
eternal justice (and recent friendship),
does not apply to the United States of America. There, if one may
believe the long and
helpless indignations of their daily and
weekly Press, the majority of
municipal rulers appear to be thieves
of a particularly irrepressible sort. But this by the way. My
concern is with a statement issuing from the average
temperament" target="_blank" title="n.气质;性格">
temperamentand the average
wisdom of a great and
wealthycommunity, and
uttered by a civic magistrate
obviously without fear and without
reproach.
I
confess I am pleased with his
temper, which is that of prudence.
"I have not read the books," he says, and immediately he adds, "and
if I have read them I have forgotten." This is excellent caution.
And I like his style: it is unartificial and bears the stamp of
manly
sincerity. As a reported piece of prose this
declaration is
easy to read and not difficult to believe. Many books have not
been read; still more have been forgotten. As a piece of civic
oratory this
declaration is strikingly
effective. Calculated to
fall in with the bent of the popular mind, so familiar with all
forms of
forgetfulness, it has also the power to stir up a subtle
emotion while it starts a train of thought--and what greater force
can be expected from human speech? But it is in naturalness that
this
declaration is
perfectlydelightful, for there is nothing more
natural than for a grave City Father to forget what the books he
has read once--long ago--in his giddy youth maybe--were about.
And the books in question are novels, or, at any rate, were written
as novels. I proceed thus
cautiously (following my illustrious
example) because being without fear and desiring to remain as far
as possible without
reproach, I
confess at once that I have not
read them.
I have not; and of the million persons or more who are said to have
read them, I never met one yet with the
talent of lucid exposition
sufficiently developed to give me a connected
account of what they
are about. But they are books, part and
parcel of
humanity, and as
such, in their ever increasing, jostling
multitude, they are worthy
of regard,
admiration, and
compassion.
Especially of
compassion. It has been said a long time ago that
books have their fate. They have, and it is very much like the
destiny of man. They share with us the great incertitude of
ignominy or glory--of
severe justice and
senseless persecution--of
calumny and misunderstanding--the shame of un
deserved success. Of
all the inanimate objects, of all men's creations, books are the
nearest to us, for they
contain our very thought, our ambitions,
our indignations, our illusions, our
fidelity to truth, and our
persistent leaning towards error. But most of all they
resemble us
in their
precarious hold on life. A
bridge constructed according
to the rules of the art of
bridge-building is certain of a long,
honourable and useful
career. But a book as good in its way as the
bridge may
perish obscurely on the very day of its birth. The art
of their creators is not sufficient to give them more than a moment
of life. Of the books born from the restlessness, the
inspiration,