sobriety that I have maintained, to show an example in my latter
days of riotous living;
therefore, Mrs. Pringle, and her daughter,
and me, have made a point of going
nowhere three times in the week;
but as for Andrew Pringle, my son, he has forgathered with some
acquaintance, and I fancy we will be obliged to let him take the
length of his tether for a while. But not
altogether without a curb
neither, for the agent's son, young Mr. Argent, had almost persuaded
him to become a member of Parliament, which he said he could get him
made, for more than a thousand pounds less than the common price--
the state of the new king's health having lowered the
commodity of
seats. But this I would by no means hear of; he is not yet come to
years of
discretion enough to sit in council; and,
moreover, he has
not been tried; and no man, till he has out of doors shown something
of what he is, should be entitled to power and honour within. Mrs.
Pringle, however, thought he might do as well as young Dunure; but
Andrew Pringle, my son, has not the solidity of head that Mr. K-dy
has, and is over free and outspoken, and cannot take such pains to
make his little go a great way, like that well-behaved young
gentleman. But you will be grieved to hear that Mr. K-dy is in
opposition to the government; and truly I am at a loss to understand
how a man of Whig principles can be an
adversary to the House of
Hanover. But I never meddled much in politick affairs, except at
this time, when I prohibited Andrew Pringle, my son, from offering
to be a member of Parliament,
notwithstanding the great
bargain that
he would have had of the place.
And since we are on public concerns, I should tell you, that I was
minded to send you a newspaper at the
second-hand, every day when we
were done with it. But when we came to inquire, we found that we
could get the newspaper for a
shilling a week every morning but
Sunday, to our breakfast, which was so much cheaper than buying a
whole paper, that Mrs. Pringle thought it would be a great
extravagance; and, indeed, when I came to think of the loss of time
a newspaper every day would occasion to my people, I considered it
would be very wrong of me to send you any at all. For I do think
that honest folks in a
far-off country
parish should not make or
meddle with the things that
pertain to government,--the more
especially, as it is well known, that there is as much
falsehood as
truth in newspapers, and they have not the means of testing their
statements. Not, however, that I am an
advocate for passive
obedience; God
forbid. On the
contrary, if ever the time should
come, in my day, of a saint-slaying
tyrant attempting to bind the
burden of prelatic abominations on our backs, such a blast of the
gospel
trumpet would be heard in Garnock, as it does not become me
to say, but I leave it to you and others, who have
experienced my
capacity as a soldier of the word so long, to think what it would
then be. Meanwhile, I remain, my dear sir, your friend and pastor,
Z. PRINGLE.
When Mr. Snodgrass had perused this
epistle, he paused some time,
seemingly in doubt, and then he said to Mr. Micklewham, that,
considering the view which the Doctor had taken of the matter, and
that he had not gone to the playhouse for the motives which usually
take bad people to such places, he thought there could be no
possible harm in
reading the letter to the elders, and that Mr.
Craig, so far from being displeased, would
doubtless be exceedingly
rejoiced to learn that the playhouses of London were
occasionally so
well employed as on the night when the Doctor was there.
Mr. Micklewham then inquired if Mr. Snodgrass had heard from Mr.
Andrew, and was answered in the affirmative; but the letter was not
read. Why it was
withheld our readers must guess for themselves;
but we have been
fortunate enough to
obtain the following copy.
LETTER XVII
Andrew Pringle, Esq., to the Rev. Mr. Charles Snodgrass--LONDON.
My Dear Friend--As the season advances, London gradually unfolds,
like Nature, all the
variety of her powers and pleasures. By the
Argents we have been introduced
effectually into society, and have
now only to choose our
acquaintance among those whom we like best.
I should employ another word than choose, for I am convinced that
there is no choice in the matter. In his friendships and
affections, man is subject to some inscrutable moral law, similar in
its effects to what the chemists call
affinity. While under the
blind influence of this
sympathy, we, forsooth, suppose ourselves