postulat delectantur, ut Titius pila, Brulla talis. De Orat.
lib. iii.
Quinctilian advised his pupils to avoid all
sterile amusements,
which, he said, were only the
resource of the ignorant.
In after-times men of merit, such as John Huss and Cardinal
Cajetan, bewailed both the time lost in the most
innocent games,
and the
disastrouspassions which are
thereby excited. Montaigne
calls chess a
stupid and
childish game. `I hate and shun it,' he
says, `because it occupies one too
seriously; I am
ashamed of
giving it the attention which would be sufficient for some useful
purpose.' King James I., the British Solomon,
forbade chess to
his son, in the famous book of royal
instruction which he wrote
for him.
As to the plea of `filling up time,' Addison has made some very
pertinent observations:--`Whether any kind of gaming has ever
thus much to say for itself, I shall not determine; but I think
it is very wonderful to see persons of the best sense passing
away a dozen hours together in shuffling and dividing a pack of
cards, with no other conversation but what is made up of a
few game-phrases, and no other ideas but those of black or red
spots ranged together in different figures. Would not a man
laugh to hear any one of his
species complaining that life is
short?'
Men of
intellect may rest
assured that whether they win or lose
at play, it will always be at the cost of their
genius; the soul
cannot support two
passions together. The
passion of play,
although fatigued, is never satiated, and
therefore it always
leaves behind protracted
agitation. The famous Roman lawyer
Scaevola suffered from playing at backgammon; his head was
always
affected by it, especially when he lost the game, in fact,
it seemed to craze him. One day he returned
expressly from the
country merely to try and
convince his
opponent in a game which
he had lost, that if he had played
otherwise he would have won!
It seems that on his journey home he mentally went through the
game again, detected his mistake, and could not rest until he
went back and got his
adversary to admit the fact--for the sake
of his _amour propre_.[113]
[113] Quinctil., _Instit. Orat_. lib. XI. cap. ii.
`It is rare,' says Rousseau, `that thinkers take much
delight in play, which suspends the habit of thinking or diverts
it upon
sterile combinations; and so one of the benefits--perhaps
the only benefit conferred by the taste for the sciences, is that
it somewhat deadens that
sordidpassion of play.'
Un
fortunately such was not the result among the
literary and
scientific men, in France or England, during the last quarter of
the last century. Many of them
bitterly lamented that they ever
played, and yet played on,--going through all the grades and
degradations appointed for his votaries by the inexorable demon
of gambling.
BEAU NASH.
Nature had by no means formed Nash for _beau_. His person was
clumsy, large, and
awkward; his features were harsh, strong, and
peculiarly
irregular; yet even with these disadvantages he made
love, became an
universaladmirer of the sex, and was in his turn
universally admired. The fact is, he was possessed of, at least,
some requisites of a `lover.' He had assiduity,
flattery, fine
clothes--and as much wit as the ladies he addressed. Accordingly
he used to say--`Wit,
flattery, and fine clothes are enough
to debauch a nunnery!' This is certainly a fouler calumny of
women than Pope's
`Every woman is at heart a rake.'
Beau Nash was a barrister, and had been a
remarkable, a
distinguished one in his day--although not at the bar. He had
the honour to
organize and direct the last grand `revel and
pageant' before a king, in the Hall of the Middle Temple, of
which he was a member.
It had long been
customary for the Inns of Court to
entertain our
monarchs upon their
accession to the crown with a revel and
pageant, and the last was exhibited in honour of King William,
when Nash was chosen to conduct the whole with proper decorum.