the last century,
actually slept with a blunderbuss and a pair of
pistols at her side, to protect her Faro bank.
On the 11th of March, 1797, her Ladyship, together with Lady
E. Lutterell and a Mrs Sturt, were convicted at the Marlborough
Street Police-court, in the
penalty of L50, for playing at the
game of Faro; and Henry Martindale was convicted in the sum of
L200, for keeping the Faro table at Lady Buckinghamshire's.
The witnesses had been servants of her Ladyship, recently
discharged on
account of a late
extraordinary loss of 500 guineas
from her Ladyship's house, belonging to the Faro bank.[103]
[103] The case is reported in the Times of March 13th, 1797.
One cannot help being struck with the appearance of the Times
newspaper at that period--70 years ago. It was printed on one
small sheet, about equal to a single page of the present issue,
and contained four pages, two of which were advertisements, while
the others gave only a short
summary of news--no leader at all.
In the same year, the croupier at the Countess of
Buckinghamshire's one night announced the un
accountable
disappearance of the cash-box of the Faro bank. All eyes were
turned towards her Ladyship. Mrs Concannon said she once lost a
gold snuff-box from the table, while she went to speak to Lord
C--. Another lady said she lost her purse there last winter.
And a story was told that a certain lady had taken, _BY
MISTAKE_, a cloak which did not belong to her, at a rout
given by the Countess of ----. Unfortunately a discovery of the
cloak was made, and when the servant knocked at the door to
demand it, some very
valuable lace which it was trimmed with had
been taken off. Some surmised that the lady who stole the cloak
might also have
stolen the Faro bank cash-box.
Soon after, the same Martindale, who had kept the Faro bank at
Lady Buckinghamshire's, became a
bankrupt, and his debts
amounted
to L328,000, besides `debts of honour,' which were struck off
to the
amount of L150,000. His
failure is said to have been
owing to misplaced confidence in a
subordinate, who robbed him of
thousands. The first
suspicion was occasioned by his purchasing
an
estate of L500 a year; but other purchases followed to a
considerable
extent; and it was soon discovered that the Faro
bank had been robbed sometimes of 2000 guineas a week! On the
14th of April, 1798, other arrears, to a large
amount, were
submitted to, and rejected by, the Commissioners in Bankruptcy,
who declared a first
dividend of one
shilling and five-pence in
the pound.[104]
[104] Seymour Harcourt, _Gaming Calendar._
This chapter cannot be better concluded than with quoting
the _Epilogue_ of `The Oxonian in Town,' 1767, humorously
painting some of the mischiefs of gambling, and expressly
addressed to the ladies:--
`Lo! next, to my
prophetic eye there starts
A
beauteous gamestress in the Queen of Hearts.
The cards are dealt, the fatal pool is lost,
And all her golden hopes for ever cross'd.
Yet still this card-devoted fair I view--
Whate'er her luck, to "_honour_" ever true.
So tender there,--if debts crowd fast upon her,
She'll pawn her "virtue" to
preserve her "honour."
Thrice happy were my art, could I foretell,
Cards would be soon abjured by every belle!
Yet, I pronounce, who
cherish still the vice,
And the pale vigils keep of cards and dice--
'Twill in their charms sad havoc make, ye fair!
Which "rouge" in vain shall labour to repair.
Beauties will grow mere hags, toasts wither'd jades,
Frightful and ugly as--the _QUEEN OF SPADES_.'
CHAPTER XI.
GAMBLING POETS, SAVANTS, PHILOSOPHERS, WITS, AND STATESMEN.
Perhaps the stern moralist who may have turned over these pages
has frowned at the facts of the
preceding chapter. If so, I know
not what he will do at those which I am about to record.
If it may be said that gamesters must be madmen, or rogues, how