cannot imagine
motion without some Power moving through the
medium of some
subordinateagency, ever
acting on the sun, to
send such floods of light and heat to our
otherwise cold and dark
terrestrial ball; but it is the
overwhelmingmagnitude of such
power that we are
incapable of comprehending. The
agencynecessary to throw out the floods of flame seen during the few
moments of a total
eclipse of the sun, and the power
requisite to
burst open a
cavity in its surface, such as could entirely
engulph our earth, will ever set all the thinking
capacity of man
at nought."
[4] The Observatory, Nos. 34, 42, 45, 49, and 58.
[5] We regret to say that Sheriff Barclay died a few months ago,
greatly respected by all who knew him.
[6] Sir E. Denison Beckett, in his Rudimentary Treatise on clocks
and Watches and Bells, has given an
instance or the
telescope-driving clock, invented by Mr. Cooke (p. 213).
[7] J. Norman Lockyer, F.R.S.--Stargazing, Past and Present, p.
302.
[8] This excellent
instrument is now in the possession of my
son-in-law, Dr. Hartree, of Leigh, near Tunbridge.
[9] An interesting
account of Mr. Alvan Clark is given in
Professor Newcomb's 'Popular Astronomy,' p. 137.
[10] A
photographicrepresentation of this
remarkabletelescopeis given as the frontispiece to Mr. Lockyer's Stargazing, Past
and Present; and a full
description of the
instrument is given in
the text of the same work. This refr
actingtelescope did not
long remain the largest. Mr. Alvan Clark was commissioned to
erect a larger
equatorial for Washington Observatory; the
object-glass (the rough disks of which were also furnished by
Messrs. Chance of Birmingham)
exceeding in
aperture that of Mr.
Cooke's by only one inch. This was finished and mounted in
November, 1873. Another
instrument of similar size and power was
manufactured by Mr. Clark for the University of Virginia. But
these
instruments did not long
maintain their
supremacy. In
1881, Mr. Howard Grubb, of Dublin, manufactured a still larger
instrument for the Austrian Government--the object-glass being of
twenty-seven inches
aperture. But Mr. Alvan Clark was not to be
beaten. In 1882, he supplied the Russian Government with the
largest refr
actingtelescope in
existence the object-glass being
of thirty inches
diameter. Even this, however, is to be
surpassed by the lens which Mr. Clark has in hand for the Lick
Observatory (California), which is to have a clear
aperture of
three feet in
diameter.
[11] Since the above passage was written and in type, I have seen
(in September 1884) the reflecting
telescope referred to at pp.
357-8. It was mounted on its cast-iron
equatorial stand, and at
work in the field adjoining the village green at Bainbridge,
Yorkshire. The mirror of the
telescope is 8 inches in
diameter;
its focal length, 5 feet; and the tube in which it is mounted,
about 6 feet long. The
instrument seemed to me to have an
excellent defining power.
But Mr. Lancaster, like every eager
astronomer, is
anxious for
further improvements. He considers the achromatic
telescope the
king of
instruments, and is now engaged in testing convex optical
surfaces, with a view to achieving a
telescope of that
description. The chief difficulty is the heavy
charge for the
circular blocks of flint glass
requisite for the work which he
meditates. "That," he says, "is the great difficulty with
amateurs of my class." He has, however, already contrived and
constructed a machine for grinding and
polishing the lenses in an
accurate convex form, and it works quite
satisfactorily. Mr.
Lancaster makes his own tools. From the raw material, whether of
glass or steel, he produces the work required. As to tools, all
that he requires is a bar of steel and fire; his
fertile brain
and busy hands do the rest. I looked into the little workshop
behind his sitting-room, and found it full of ingenious
adaptations. The turning lathe occupies a
considerable part of
it; but when he requires more space, the village smith with his
stithy, and the
miller with his water-power, are always ready to
help him. His tools, though not showy, are
effective. His best
lenses are made by himself: those which he buys are not to be
depended upon. The best flint glass is obtained from Paris in
blocks, which he divides, grinds, and
polishes to perfect form.
I was attracted by a newly made machine, placed on a table in the
sitting-room; and on
inquiry found that its object was to grind
and
polish lenses. Mr. Lancaster explained that the difficulty
to be
overcome in a good machine, is to make the emery cut the
surface
equally from centre to edge of the lens, so that the lens
will neither
lengthen nor
shorten the curve during its
production. To quote his words: "This really involves the
problem of the 'three bodies,' or disturbing forces so celebrated
in dynamical
mathematics, and it is further
complicated by
another quantity, the 'coefficient of attrition,' or work done by
the grinding material, as well as the
mischief done by capillary
attractionand nodal points of superimposed curves in the path of
the tool. These complications tend to cause rings or waves of
unequal wear in the surface of the glass, and ruin the defining
power of the lens, which depends upon the
uniformity of its
curve. As the
outcome of much practical experiment, combined
with
mathematicalresearch, I settled upon the ratio of speed
between the sheave of the lens-tool guide and the turn-table;
between whose limits the practical equalization of wear (or cut
of the emery) might with the greater
facility be adjusted, by
means of varying the stroke and eccentricity of the tool. As the
result of these considerations in the
construction of the
machine, the surface of the glass 'comes up'
regularly all over
the lens; and the
polishing only takes a few minutes' work--thus
keeping the truth of surface gained by using a rigid tool."
The machine in question consists of a revolving sheave or ring,
with a sliding strip across its
diameter; the said strip having a
slot and clamping screw at one end, and a hole towards the other,
through which passes the axis of the tool used in forming the
lens,--the slot in the strip allowing the tool to give any stroke
from 0 to 1.25 inch. The lens is carried on a revolving
turn-table, with an
arrangement to allow the axis of the lens to
coincide with the axis of the table. The ratio of speed between
the sheave and turn-table is arranged by belt and
properly sized
pulleys, and the whole can be
driven either by hand or by power.
The sheave merely serves as a guide to the tool in its path, and
the lens may either be worked on the turn-table or upon a chuck
attached to the tool rod. The work upon the lens is thus to a
great
extent independent of the error of the machine through
shaking, or bad
fitting, or wear; and the only part of the
machine which requires really
first-class work is the axis of the
turn-table, which (in this machine) is a conical
bearing at top,
with steel centre below,--the
bearing turned, hardened, and then
ground up true, and run in anti-friction metal. Other details
might be given, but these are probably enough for present
purposes. We hope, at some future time, for a special detail of
Mr. Lancaster's interesting investigations, from his own mind and
pen.
[12] The translations are made by W. Cadwalladr Davies, Esq.
[13] This evidence was given by Mr. W. Cadwalladr Davies on the
28th October, 1880.
End