King James's Kommission, and were Kalled Kolonels and
Kaptains, but who were Kolonels without regiments and
Kaptains without Kompanies.'
A moment of FV in all this world of K's! It was not the
English language, then, that was an
instrument of one string,
but Macaulay that was an
incomparable dauber.
It was probably from this barbaric love of repeating the same
sound, rather than from any design of
clearness, that he
acquired his irritating habit of repeating words; I say the
one rather than the other, because such a trick of the ear is
deeper-seated and more original in man than any logical
consideration. Few
writers, indeed, are probably conscious
of the length to which they push this
melody of letters.
One,
writing very
diligently, and only
concerned about the
meaning of his words and the
rhythm of his
phrases, was
struck into
amazement by the eager
triumph with which he
cancelled one expression to
substitute another. Neither
changed the sense; both being mono-syllables, neither could
affect the scansion; and it was only by looking back on what
he had already written that the
mystery was solved: the
second word contained an open A, and for nearly half a page
he had been riding that vowel to the death.
In practice, I should add, the ear is not always so exacting;
and ordinary
writers, in ordinary moments, content themselves
with avoiding what is harsh, and here and there, upon a rare
occasion, buttressing a
phrase, or linking two together, with
a patch of assonance or a
momentaryjingle of alliteration.
To understand how
constant is this pre
occupation of good
writers, even where its results are least obtrusive, it is
only necessary to turn to the bad. There, indeed, you will
find cacophony
supreme, the
rattle of incongruous consonants
only relieved by the jaw-breaking hiatus, and whole
phrases
not to be articulated by the powers of man.
CONCLUSION. - We may now
brieflyenumerate the elements of
style. We have,
peculiar to the prose
writer, the task of
keeping his
phrases large,
rhythmical, and
pleasing to the
ear, without ever allowing them to fall into the strictly
metrical:
peculiar to the versifier, the task of combining
and contrasting his double,
treble, and quadruple pattern,
feet and groups, logic and metre -
harmonious in diversity:
common to both, the task of artfully combining the prime
elements of language into
phrases that shall be
musical in
the mouth; the task of weaving their
argument into a texture
of committed
phrases and of rounded periods - but this
particularly
binding in the case of prose: and, again common
to both, the task of choosing apt, explicit, and
communicative words. We begin to see now what an intricate
affair is any perfect passage; how many faculties, whether of
taste or pure reason, must be held upon the stretch to make
it; and why, when it is made, it should afford us so complete
a pleasure. From the
arrangement of according letters, which
is
altogether arabesque and sensual, up to the architecture
of the
elegant and
pregnantsentence, which is a
vigorous act
of the pure
intellect, there is
scarce a
faculty in man but
has been exercised. We need not wonder, then, if perfect
sentences are rare, and perfect pages rarer.
CHAPTER II - THE MORALITY OF THE PROFESSION OF LETTERS (11)
THE
profession of letters has been
lately debated in the
public prints; and it has been debated, to put the matter
mildly, from a point of view that was calculated to surprise
high-minded men, and bring a general
contempt on books and
reading. Some time ago, in particular, a
lively, pleasant,
popular
writer (12)
devoted an essay,
lively and pleasant
like himself, to a very encouraging view of the
profession.
We may be glad that his experience is so cheering, and we may
hope that all others, who
deserve it, shall be as handsomely
rewarded; but I do not think we need be at all glad to have
this question, so important to the public and ourselves,
debated
solely on the ground of money. The salary in any
business under heaven is not the only, nor indeed the first,
question. That you should continue to exist is a matter for
your own
consideration; but that your business should be
first honest, and second useful, are points in which honour
and
morality are
concerned. If the
writer to whom I refer
succeeds in persuading a number of young persons to adopt
this way of life with an eye set singly on the
livelihood, we
must expect them in their works to follow profit only, and we
must expect in
consequence, if he will
pardon me the
epithets, a slovenly, base,
untrue, and empty
literature. Of
that
writer himself I am not
speaking: he is diligent,
clean, and
pleasing; we all owe him periods of entertainment,
and he has achieved an
amiablepopularity which he has
adequately
deserved. But the truth is, he does not, or did
not when he first embraced it, regard his
profession from
this
purelymercenary side. He went into it, I shall venture
to say, if not with any noble design, at least in the ardour
of a first love; and he enjoyed its practice long before he
paused to calculate the wage. The other day an author was
complimented on a piece of work, good in itself and
exceptionally good for him, and replied, in terms
unworthy of
a
commercial traveller that as the book was not briskly
selling he did not give a
copperfarthing for its merit. It
must not be
supposed that the person to whom this answer was
addressed received it as a
profession of faith; he knew, on
the other hand, that it was only a whiff of
irritation; just
as we know, when a
respectablewriter talks of
literature as
a way of life, like shoemaking, but not so useful, that he is
only debating one
aspect of a question, and is still clearly
conscious of a dozen others more important in themselves and
more central to the matter in hand. But while those who
treat
literature in this penny-wise and virtue-foolish spirit
are themselves truly in possession of a better light, it does
not follow that the
treatment is
decent or improving, whether
for themselves or others. To treat all subjects in the
highest, the most
honourable, and the pluckiest spirit,
consistent with the fact, is the first duty of a
writer. If
he be well paid, as I am glad to hear he is, this duty
becomes the more
urgent, the
neglect of it the more
disgraceful. And perhaps there is no subject on which a man
should speak so
gravely as that industry,
whatever it may be,
which is the
occupation or delight of his life; which is his
tool to earn or serve with; and which, if it be
unworthy,
stamps himself as a mere incubus of dumb and
greedy bowels on
the shoulders of labouring
humanity. On that subject alone
even to force the note might lean to virtue's side. It is to
be hoped that a numerous and
enterprisinggeneration of
writers will follow and
surpass the present one; but it would
be better if the
stream were stayed, and the roll of our old,
honest English books were closed, than that esurient book-
makers should continue and debase a brave
tradition, and
lower, in their own eyes, a famous race. Better that our
serene temples were deserted than filled with trafficking and
juggling priests.
There are two just reasons for the choice of any way of life:
the first is inbred taste in the chooser; the second some
high
utility in the industry selected. Literature, like any
other art, is singularly interesting to the artist; and, in a
degree
peculiar to itself among the arts, it is useful to
mankind. These are the sufficient
justifications for any
young man or woman who adopts it as the business of his life.
I shall not say much about the wages. A
writer can live by
his
writing. If not so luxuriously as by other trades, then
less luxuriously. The nature of the work he does all day
will more
affect his happiness than the quality of his dinner
at night. Whatever be your
calling, and however much it
brings you in the year, you could still, you know, get more
by cheating. We all suffer ourselves to be too much
concerned about a little
poverty; but such
considerations
should not move us in the choice of that which is to be the
business and
justification of so great a
portion of our