in his Song, the Man in Allegory and Abstraction; we seem to have the
Man--the Bon-homme--Omar himself, with all his Humours and Passions,
as
frankly before us as if we were really at Table with him, after the
Wine had gone round.
<8> A note to Quatrain 234 admits that, however clear the
mystical
meaning of such Images must be to Europeans, they are not quoted
without "rougissant" even by laymen in Persia--"Quant aux termes de
tendresse qui commencent ce quatrain, comme tant d'autres dans ce
recueil, nos lecteurs, habitues maintenant a 1'etrangete des
expressions si souvent employees par Kheyam pour rendre ses pensees
sur l'amour divin, et a la singularite des images trop
orientales,
d'une sensualite quelquefois revoltante, n'auront pas de peine a se
persuader qu'il s'agit de la Divinite, bien que cette conviction
soit vivement discutee par les moullahs musulmans, et meme par
beaucoup de laiques, qui rougissent
veritablement d'une pareille
licence de leur compatriote a 1'egard des choses spirituelles."
I must say that I, for one, never
wholly believed in the Mysticism of
Hafiz. It does not appear there was any danger in
holding and singing
Sufi Pantheism, so long as the Poet made his Salaam to Mohammed at the
beginning and end of his Song. Under such conditions Jelaluddin,
Jami, Attar, and others sang; using Wine and Beauty indeed as Images
to
illustrate, not as a Mask to hide, the Divinity they were
celebrating. Perhaps some Allegory less
liable to mistake or abuse
had been better among so inflammable a People: much more so when, as
some think with Hafiz and Omar, the
abstract is not only likened to,
but identified with, the sensual Image;
hazardous, if not to the
Devotee himself, yet to his weaker Brethren; and worse for the Profane
in
proportion as the Devotion of the Initiated grew warmer. And all
for what? To be tantalized with Images of sensual
enjoyment which
must be renounced if one would
approximate a God, who according to the
Doctrine, is Sensual Matter as well as Spirit, and into whose Universe
one expects
unconsciously to merge after Death, without hope of any
posthumous Beatitude in another world to
compensate for all one's self-
denial in this. Lucretius' blind Divinity certainly merited, and
probably got, as much self-sacrifice as this of the Sufi; and the
burden of Omar's Song--if not "Let us eat"--is assuredly--"Let us
drink, for To-morrow we die!" And if Hafiz meant quite
otherwise by a
similar language, he surely miscalculated when he
devoted his Life and
Genius to so equivocal a Psalmody as, from his Day to this, has been
said and sung by any rather than
spiritual Worshippers.
However, as there is some
traditionalpresumption, and certainly the
opinion of some
learned men, in favour of Omar's being a Sufi--and
even something of a Saint--those who please may so interpret his Wine
and Cup-bearer. On the other hand, as there is far more
historicalcertainty of his being a Philosopher, of
scientific Insight and
Ability far beyond that of the Age and Country he lived in; of such
moderate
worldly Ambition as becomes a Philosopher, and such moderate
wants as
rarely satisfy a Debauchee; other readers may be content to
believe with me that, while the Wine Omar celebrates is simply the
Juice of the Grape, he bragg'd more than he drank of it, in very
defiance perhaps of that Spiritual Wine which left its Votaries sunk
in Hypocrisy or Disgust.
Edward J. Fitzgerald
First Edition
I.
Awake! for Morning in the Bowl of Night
Has flung the Stone that puts the Stars to Flight:
And Lo! the Hunter of the East has caught
The Sultan's Turret in a Noose of Light.
II.
Dreaming when Dawn's Left Hand was in the Sky
I heard a Voice within the Tavern cry,
"Awake, my Little ones, and fill the Cup
Before Life's Liquor in its Cup be dry."
III.
And, as the Cock crew, those who stood before
The Tavern shouted--"Open then the Door.
You know how little while we have to stay,
And, once
departed, may return no more."