a passing phase of vegetarianism, and with the
ferment of youth
working headily within him he could hardly escape the charge
of being a crank, but "a crank, if a little thing, makes revolutions,"
and Brooke's
youthful extravagances were utterly untinged with decadence.
He took his
classical tripos in 1909, and after spending some time
as a student in Munich, returned to live near Cambridge
at the Old Vicarage in "the lovely
hamlet, Grantchester." "It was there,"
writes Mr. Raglan H. E. H. Somerset in a letter I am
privileged to quote,
"that I used to wake him on Sunday mornings to bathe in the dam
above Byron's Pool. His bedroom was always littered with books,
English, French, and German, in wild
disorder. About his bathing
one thing stands out; time after time he would try to dive;
he always failed and came
absolutely flat, but seemed to like it,
although it must have hurt excessively." (This was only
when he was
learning. Later he became an
accomplished diver.)
"Then we used to go back and feed, sometimes in the Orchard and sometimes
in the Old Vicarage Garden, on eggs and that particular brand of honey
referred to in the `Grantchester' poem. In those days he always dressed
in the same way:
cricket shirt and
trousers and no stockings; in fact,
`Rupert's mobile toes' were a subject for the
admiration of his friends."
Brooke occupied himself
mainly with
writing. Poems,
remarkable for
a happy spontaneity such as characterized the work of T. E. Brown,
the Manx poet, appeared in the `Gownsman', the `Cambridge Review',
the `Nation', the `English Review', and the `Westminster Gazette'.
Students of the "Problem Page" in the `Saturday Westminster'
knew him as a
brilliantcompetitor who infused the
purely academic
with the very spirit of youth.
To all who knew him, the man himself was at least as important as his work.
"As to his talk" -- I quote again from Mr. Somerset --
"he was a spendthrift. I mean that he never saved anything up
as those
writer fellows so often do. He was quite inconsequent
and just rippled on, but was always ready to attack a
careless thinker.
On the other hand, he was
extremelytolerant of fools, even bad poets
who are the worst kind of fools -- or rather the hardest to bear --
but that was kindness of heart."
Of his personal appearance a good deal has been said. "One who knew him,"
writing in one of the daily papers, said that "to look at, he was part
of the youth of the world. He was one of the handsomest Englishmen
of his time. His moods seemed to be merely a
disguise for the radiance
of an early summer's day."
Mr. Edward Thomas speaks of him as "a golden young Apollo"
who made friends, admirers, adorers,
wherever he went.
"He stretched himself out, drew his fingers through his waved fair hair,
laughed, talked indolently, and admired as much as he was admired. . . .
He was tall, broad, and easy in his movements. Either he stooped,
or he
thrust his head forward
unusually much to look at you
with his steady blue eyes."
On Mr. H. W. Nevinson, who, in a
fleetingeditorialcapacity, sent for
Brooke to come and discuss his poems, he made a similar impression:
"Suddenly he came -- an
astonishingapparition in any newspaper office:
loose hair of deep, browny-gold; smooth, ruddy face;
eyes not gray or bluish-white, but of living blue, really like the sky,
and as
frankly open; figure not very tall, but firm and
strongly made,
giving the sense of weight rather than of speed and yet
so
finely fashioned and
healthy that it was impossible not to think
of the line about `a pard-like spirit'. He was dressed
just in the ordinary way, except that he wore a low blue collar,
and blue shirt and tie, all
uncommon in those days.
Evidently he did not want to be
conspicuous, but the whole effect
was almost ludicrously beautiful."
Notions of
height are always
comparative, and it will be noticed
that Mr. Nevinson and Mr. Thomas
differ in their ideas.
Mr. Edward Marsh, however, Brooke's
executor and one of his
closest friends -- indeed the friend of all young poets --
tells me that he was about six feet, so that all doubt on this minor point
may be set at rest.
He had been in Munich, Berlin, and in Italy, and in May, 1913,
he left England again for a
wander year, passing through
the United States and Canada on his way to the South Seas.
Perhaps some of those who met him in Boston and elsewhere
will some day
contribute their quota to the bright record of his life.
His own letters to the `Westminster Gazette', though naturally