the only book,
properly to be called a book, that I have yet written
myself, the one that will stand (if anything stand), surest and
longest of all work of mine.
"It is one very awful form of the operation of
wealth in Europe that
it is entirely capitalists'
wealth which supports
unjust wars. Just
wars do not need so much money to support them; for most of the men
who wage such, wage them gratis; but for an
unjust war, men's bodies
and souls have both to be bought; and the best tools of war for them
besides, which make such war
costly to the
maximum; not to speak of
the cost of base fear, and angry
suspicion, between nations which
have not grace nor
honesty enough in all their multitudes to buy an
hour's peace of mind with; as, at present, France and England,
purchasing of each other ten millions
sterling worth of
consternation,
annually (a
remarkably light crop, half thorns and
half aspen leaves, sown, reaped, and granaried by the 'science' of
the modern political
economist, teaching covetousness instead of
truth). And, all
unjust war being supportable, if not by pillage of
the enemy, only by loans from capitalists, these loans are repaid by
subsequent
taxation of the people, who appear to have no will in the
matter, the capitalists' will being the
primary root of the war; but
its real root is the covetousness of the whole nation, rendering it
incapable of faith,
frankness, or justice, and bringing about,
therefore, in due time, his own separate loss and
punishment to each
person."
France and England
literally, observe, buy PANIC of each other; they
pay, each of them, for ten thousand-thousand-pounds'-worth of
terror, a year. Now suppose, instead of buying these ten millions'
worth of panic
annually, they made up their minds to be at peace
with each other, and buy ten millions' worth of knowledge
annually;
and that each nation spent its ten thousand thousand pounds a year
in founding royal libraries, royal art galleries, royal museums,
royal gardens, and places of rest. Might it not be better somewhat
for both French and English?
It will be long, yet, before that comes to pass. Nevertheless, I
hope it will not be long before royal or national libraries will be
founded in every
considerable city, with a royal
series of books in
them; the same
series in every one of them, chosen books, the best
in every kind, prepared for that national
series in the most perfect
way possible; their text printed all on leaves of equal size, broad
of
margin, and divided into pleasant volumes, light in the hand,
beautiful, and strong, and
thorough as examples of binders' work;
and that these great libraries will be
accessible to all clean and
orderly persons at all times of the day and evening;
strict law
being enforced for this
cleanliness and quietness.
I could shape for you other plans, for art-galleries, and for
natural history galleries, and for many precious--many, it seems to
me, needful--things; but this book plan is the easiest and
needfullest, and would prove a
considerable tonic to what we call
our British
constitution, which has fallen dropsical of late, and
has an evil
thirst, and evil
hunger, and wants healthier feeding.
You have got its corn laws repealed for it; try if you cannot get
corn laws established for it,
dealing in a better bread;--bread made
of that old enchanted Arabian grain, the Sesame, which opens doors;-
-doors not of
robbers', but of Kings' Treasuries.
LECTURE II.--LILIES OF QUEENS' GARDENS
"Be thou glad, oh
thirsting Desert; let the desert be made cheerful,
and bloom as the lily; and the
barren places of Jordan shall run
wild with wood."--ISAIAH XXXV. I. (Septuagint.)
It will, perhaps, be well, as this Lecture is the sequel of one
previously given, that I should
shortly state to you my general
intention in both. The questions
specially proposed to you in the
first,
namely, How and What to Read, rose out of a far deeper one,
which it was my
endeavour to make you propose
earnestly to
yourselves,
namely, WHY to Read. I want you to feel, with me, that
whatever advantages we possess in the present day in the diffusion
of education and of
literature, can only be
rightly used by any of
us when we have apprehended clearly what education is to lead to,
and
literature to teach. I wish you to see that both well-directed
moral training and well-chosen
reading lead to the possession of a
power over the ill-guided and
illiterate, which is, according to the
measure of it, in the truest sense, KINGLY; conferring indeed the