And God waits for us, for all of us who have the quality to reach
him. He has need of us as we of him. He desires us and desires to
make himself known to us. When at last the individual breaks
through the limiting darknesses to him, the irradiation of that
moment, the smile and soul clasp, is in God as well as in man. He
has won us from his enemy. We come staggering through into the
golden light of his kingdom, to fight for his kingdom henceforth,
until at last we are
altogether taken up into his being.
CHAPTER THE FOURTH
THE RELIGION OF ATHEISTS
1. THE SCIENTIFIC ATHEIST
It is a curious thing that while most organised religions seem to
drape about and
conceal and
smother the statement of the true God,
the honest Atheist, with his
passionate
impulse to strip the truth
bare, is
constantly and unwittingly reproducing the
divine likeness.
It will be interesting here to call a
witness or so to the extreme
instability of
absolute negation.
Here, for example, is a
deliverance from Professor Metchnikoff, who
was a very
typicalantagonist of all religion. He died only the
other day. He was a very great physiologist indeed; he was a man
almost of the rank and quality of Pasteur or Charles Darwin. A
decade or more ago he wrote a book called "The Nature of Man," in
which he set out very
plainly a number of illuminating facts about
life. They are facts so illuminating that
presently, in our
discussion of sin, they will be referred to again. But it is not
Professor Metchnikoff's
intention to provide material for a
religious
discussion. He sets out his facts in order to overthrow
theology as he conceives it. The
remarkable thing about his book,
the thing upon which I would now lay
stress, is that he betrays no
inkling of the fact that he has no longer the right to conceive
theology as he conceives it. The development of his science has
destroyed that right.
He does not realise how
profoundly modern
biology has
affected our
ideas of
individuality and
species, and how the
import of theology
is modified through these changes. When he comes from his own world
of modern
biology to religion and
philosophy he goes back in time.
He attacks religion as he understood it when first he fell out with
it fifty years or more ago.
Let us state as compactly as possible the nature of these changes
that
biological science has
wrought almost imperceptibly in the
general
scheme and method of our thinking.
The influence of
biology upon thought in general consists
essentially in diminishing the
importance of the individual and
developing the realisation of the
species, as if it were a kind of
super-individual, a modifying and
mortal" target="_blank" title="a.不死的n.不朽的人物">
immortal super-individual,
maintaining itself against the outer
universe by the birth and death
of its
constituent individuals. Natural History, which began by
putting individuals into
species as if the latter were mere
classificatory divisions, has come to see that the
species has its
adventures, its history and drama, far
exceeding in interest and
importance the individual adventure. "The Origin of Species" was
for
countless minds the discovery of a new
romance in life.
The
contrast of the individual life and this
specific life may be
stated
plainly and compactly as follows. A little while ago we
current individuals, we who are alive now, were each of us
distributed between two parents, then between four grandparents, and
so on
backward, we are
temporarily assembled, as it were, out of an
ancestral diffusion; we stand our trial, and
presently our
individuality is dispersed and mixed again with other
individualities in an
uncertainmultitude of descendants. But the
species is not like this; it goes on
steadily from newness to