the
hundredth since the press of Kilmarnock brought to light its
solitary
masterpiece, your Poems; and next year, therefore,
methinks, the
revenue will receive a
welcomeaccession from the
abundance of whisky drunk in your honour. It is a cruel thing for
any of your countrymen to feel that, where all the rest love, he can
only admire; where all the rest are idolators, he may not bend the
knee; but stands apart and beats upon his breast, observing, not
adoring--a
critic. Yet to some of us--petty souls, perhaps, and
envious--that loud indiscriminating praise of "Robbie Burns" (for so
they style you in their Change-house familiarity) has long been
ungrateful; and, among the treasures of your songs, we
venture to
select and even to
reject. So it must be! We cannot all love
Haggis, nor "painch, tripe, and thairm," and all those rural
dainties which you
celebrate as "warm-reekin, rich!" "Rather too
rich," as the Young Lady said on an occasion recorded by Sam Weller.
Auld Scotland wants nae skinking ware
That jaups in luggies;
But, if ye wish her gratefu' prayer,
Gie her a Haggis!
You HAVE given her a Haggis, with a
vengeance, and her "gratefu'
prayer" is yours for ever. But if even an
eternity of
partridge may
pall on the epicure, so of Haggis too, as of all
earthly delights,
cometh satiety at last. And yet what a
glorious Haggis it is--the
more
emphaticallyrustic and even Fescennine part of your verse! We
have had many a rural bard since Theocritus "watched the visionary
flocks," but you are the only one of them all who has
spoken the
sincere Doric. Yours is the talk of the byre and the plough-tail;
yours is that large
utterance of the early hinds. Even Theocritus
minces matters, save where Lacon and Comatas quite out-do the swains
of Ayrshire. "But thee, Theocritus, wha matches?" you ask, and
yourself out-match him in this wide rude region, trodden only by the
rural Muse. "THY rural loves are nature's sel';" and the wooer of
Jean Armour speaks more like a true
shepherd than the elegant
Daphnis of the "Oaristys."
Indeed it is with this that moral
critics of your life
reproach you,
forgetting, perhaps, that in your amours you were but as other
Scotch ploughmen and
shepherds of the past and present. Ettrick may
still, with Afghanistan, offer matter for idylls, as Mr. Carlyle
(your antithesis, and the complement of the Scotch character)
supposed; but the morals of Ettrick are those of rural Sicily in old
days, or of Mossgiel in your days. Over these matters the Kirk,
with all her power, and the Free Kirk too, have had
absolutely no
influence
whatever. To leave so
delicate a topic, you were but as
other swains, or, as "that Birkie ca'd a lord," Lord Byron; only you
combined (in certain of your letters) a libertine theory with your
practice; you poured out in song your audacious raptures, your half-
hearted
repentance, your shame and your scorn. You spoke the truth
about rural lives and loves. We may like it or
dislike it but we
cannot deny the verity.
Was it not as
unhappy a thing, Sir, for you, as it was
fortunate for
Letters and for Scotland, that you were born at the meeting of two
ages and of two worlds--precisely in the moment when bookish
literature was
beginning to reach the people, and when Society was
first
learning to admit the low-born to her Minor Mysteries? Before
you how many singers not less truly poets than yourself--though less
versatile not less
passionate, though less sensuous not less simple-
-had been born and had died in poor men's cottages! There abides
not even the shadow of a name of the old Scotch song-smiths, of the
old ballad-makers. The authors of "Clerk Saunders," of "The Wife of
Usher's Well," of "Fair Annie," and "Sir Patrick Spens," and "The
Bonny Hind," are as unknown to us as Homer, whom in their directness
and force they
resemble. They never, perhaps, gave their poems to
writing; certainly they never gave them to the press. On the lips