jump with his story--namely, that the young
priests have houses on
the river, painted of
divers colours, all of them empty.
Then the
priest, at my desire, brought me to one of the
temples,
that I might seek out all things
concerning Herodotus the
Halicarnassian, from one who knew. Now this
temple is not the
fairest in the city, but less fair and
goodly than the old
temples,
yet goodlier and more fair than the new
temples; and over the roof
there is the image of an eagle made of stone--no small
marvel, but a
great one, how men came to fashion him; and that
temple is called
the House of Queens. Here they sacrifice a boar once every year;
and
concerning this they tell a certain
sacred story which I know
but will not utter.
Then I was brought to the
priest who had a name for
knowing most
about Egypt, and the Egyptians, and the Assyrians, and the
Cappadocians, and all the kingdoms of the Great King. He came out
to me, being attired in a black robe, and wearing on his head a
square cap. But why the
priests have square caps I know, and he who
has been initiated into the mysteries which they call "Matric"
knows, but I prefer not to tell. Concerning the square cap, then,
let this be sufficient. Now, the
priest received me courteously,
and when I asked him,
concerning Herodotus, whether he were a true
man or not, he smiled and answered "Abu Goosh," which, in the tongue
of the Arabians, means "The Father of Liars." Then he went on to
speak
concerning Herodotus, and he said in his
discourse that
Herodotus not only told the thing which was not, but that he did so
wilfully, as one
knowing the truth but concealing it. For example,
quoth he, "Solon never went to see Croesus, as Herodotus avers; nor
did those about Xerxes ever dream dreams; but Herodotus, out of his
abundant wickedness, invented these things."
"Now behold," he went on, "how the curse of the Gods falls upon
Herodotus. For he pretends that he saw Cadmeian inscriptions at
Thebes. Now I do not believe there were any Cadmeian inscriptions
there:
therefore Herodotus is most
manifestly lying. Moreover,
this Herodotus never speaks of Sophocles the Athenian, and why not?
Because he, being a child at school, did not learn Sophocles by
heart: for the tragedies of Sophocles could not have been
learnedat school before they were written, nor can any man quote a poet
whom he never
learned at school. Moreover, as all those about
Herodotus knew Sophocles well, he could not appear to them to be
learned by showing that he knew what they knew also." Then I
thought the
priest was making game and sport,
saying first that
Herodotus could know no poet whom he had not
learned at school, and
then
saying that all the men of his time well knew this poet, "about
whom
everyone was talking." But the
priest seemed not to know that
Herodotus and Sophocles were friends, which is proved by this, that
Sophocles wrote an ode in praise of Herodotus.
Then he went on, and though I were to write with a hundred hands
(like Briareus, of whom Homer makes mention) I could not tell you
all the things that the
priest said against Herodotus, speaking
truly, or not truly, or sometimes
correctly and sometimes not, as
often
befalls
mortal men. For Herodotus, he said, was chiefly
concerned to steal the lore of those who came before him, such as
Hecataeus, and then to escape notice as having
stolen it. Also he
said that, being himself
cunning and
deceitful, Herodotus was easily
beguiled by the
cunning of others, and believed in things
manifestlyfalse, such as the story of the Phoenix-bird.
Then I spoke, and said that Herodotus himself declared that he could
not believe that story; but the
priest regarded me not. And he said
that Herodotus had never caught a
crocodile with cold pig, nor did
he ever visit Assyria, nor Babylon, nor Elephantine; but,
sayingthat he had been in these lands, said that which was not true. He
also declared that Herodotus, when he travelled, knew none of the
Fat Ones of the Egyptians, but only those of the baser sort. And he
called Herodotus a thief and a beguiler, and "the same with intent
to deceive," as one of their own poets writes. And, to be short,
Herodotus, I could not tell you in one day all the charges which are
now brought against you; but
concerning the truth of these things,
YOU know, not least, but most, as to yourself being
guilty or
innocent. Wherefore, if you have anything to show or set forth
whereby you may be relieved from the burden of these accusations,
now is the time. Be no longer silent; but, whether through the
Oracle of the Dead, or the Oracle of Branchidae, or that in Delphi,
or Dodona, or of Amphiaraus at Oropus, speak to your friends and
lovers (whereof I am one from of old) and let men know the very
truth.
Now,
concerning the
priests in the City of the Ford of the Ox, it is
to be said that of all men whom we know they receive strangers most
gladly, feasting them all day. Moreover, they have many drinks,
cunningly mixed, and of these the best is that they call Archdeacon,
naming it from one of the
priests' offices. Truly, as Homer says
(if the Odyssey be Homer's), "when that
draught is poured into the
bowl then it is no pleasure to refrain."
Drinking of this wine, or nectar, Herodotus, I
pledge you, and pour
forth some deal on the ground, to Herodotus of Halicarnassus, in the
House of Hades.
And I wish you
farewell, and good be with you. Whether the
priestspoke truly, or not truly, even so may such good things betide you
as
befall dead men.
LETTER--Epistle to Mr. Alexander Pope
From
mortal Gratitude, decide, my Pope,
Have Wits Im
mortal more to fear or hope?
Wits toil and travail round the Plant of Fame,
Their Works its Garden, and its Growth their Aim,
Then Commentators, in unwieldy Dance,
Break down the Barriers of the trim Pleasance,
Pursue the Poet, like Actaeon's Hounds,
Beyond the fences of his Garden Grounds,
Rend from the singing Robes each borrowed Gem,
Rend from the
laurel'd Brows the Diadem,
And, if one Rag of Character they spare,
Comes the Biographer, and strips it bare!
Such, Pope, has been thy Fortune, such thy Doom.
Swift the Ghouls gathered at the Poet's Tomb,
With Dust of Notes to clog each
lordly Line,
Warburton, Warton, Croker, Bowles, combine!
Collecting Cackle, Johnson condescends
To INTERVIEW the Drudges of your Friends.
Thus though your Courthope holds your merits high,
And still proclaims your Poems POETRY,
Biographers, un-Boswell-like, have sneered,
And Dunces edit him whom Dunces feared!
They say, "what say they?" Not in vain You ask;
To tell you what they say, behold my Task!
"Methinks already I your Tears survey"
As I repeat "the
horrid Things they say." {2}
Comes El-n first: I fancy you'll agree
Not frenzied Dennis smote so fell as he;
For El-n's Introduction, crabbed and dry,
Like Churchill's Cudgel's {3} marked with LIE, and LIE!
"Too dull to know what his own System meant,
Pope yet was
skilled new Treasons to invent;
A Snake that puffed himself and stung his Friends,
Few Lied so
frequent, for such little Ends;
His mind, like Flesh inflamed, {4} was raw and sore,
And still, the more he writhed, he stung the more!
Oft in a Quarrel, never in the Right,