fix themselves upon John Brown.
Eventually, the "simple mountaineer" became almost a state
personage. The
influence which he wielded was not to be overlooked. Lord Beaconsfield was
careful, from time to time, to send
courteous messages to "Mr. Brown" in his
letters to the Queen, and the French Government took particular pains to
provide for his comfort during the visits of the English Sovereign to France.
It was only natural that among the elder members of the royal family he should
not have been popular, and that his failings--for failings he had, though
Victoria would never notice his too acute
appreciation of Scotch
whisky--should have been the subject of acrimonious
comment at Court. But he
served his
mistressfaithfully" target="_blank" title="ad.忠实地;诚恳地">
faithfully, and to
ignore him would be a sign of
disrespect to her
biographer. For the Queen, far from making a secret of her
affectionate friendship, took care to publish it to the world. By her orders
two gold medals were struck in his honour; on his death, in 1883, a long and
eulogistic obituary notice of him appeared in the Court Circular; and a Brown
memorial brooch--of gold, with the late gillie's head on one side and the
royal monogram on the other--was designed by Her Majesty for
presentation to
her Highland servants and cottagers, to be worn by them on the
anniversary of
his death, with a
mourning scarf and pins. In the second
series of extracts
from the Queen's Highland Journal, published in 1884, her "
devoted personal
attendant and
faithful friend" appears upon almost every page, and is in
effect the hero of the book. With an
absence of reticence
remarkable in royal
persons, Victoria seemed to demand, in this private and
delicate matter, the
sympathy of the whole nation; and yet--such is the world--there were those who
actually treated the relations between their Sovereign and her servant as a
theme for ribald jests.
II
The busy years hastened away; the traces of Time's unimaginable touch grew
manifest; and old age, approaching, laid a gentle hold upon Victoria. The grey
hair whitened; the
mature features mellowed; the short firm figure amplified
and moved more slowly, supported by a stick. And,
simultaneously, in the whole
tenour of the Queen's
existence an
extraordinarytransformation came to pass.
The nation's attitude towards her,
critical and even
hostile as it had been
for so many years,
altogether changed; while there was a corresponding
alteration in the
temper of--Victoria's own mind.
Many causes led to this result. Among them were the
repeated strokes of
personal
misfortune which
befell the Queen during a
cruelly short space of
years. In 1878 the Princess Alice, who had married in 1862 the Prince Louis of
HesseDarmstadt, died in
tragic circumstances. In the following year the Prince
Imperial, the only son of the Empress Eugenie, to whom Victoria, since the
catastrophe of 1870, had become
devotedly attached, was killed in the Zulu
War. Two years later, in 1881, the Queen lost Lord Beaconsfield, and, in 1883,
John Brown. In 1884 the Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany, who had been an
invalid from birth, died pre
maturely,
shortly after his marriage. Victoria's
cup of sorrows was indeed overflowing; and the public, as it watched the
widowed mother
weeping for her children and her friends, displayed a
constantly increasing sympathy.
An event which occurred in 1882 revealed and accentuated the feelings of the
nation. As the Queen, at Windsor, was walking from the train to her
carriage,
a youth named Roderick Maclean fired a
pistol at her from a distance of a few
yards. An Eton boy struck up Maclean's arm with an
umbrella before the
pistolwent off; no damage was done, and the
culprit was at once arrested. This was
the last of a
series of seven attempts upon the Queen--attempts which, taking
place at sporadic
intervals over a period of forty years, resembled one
another in a curious manner. All, with a single
exception, were perpetrated by
adolescents, whose motives were
apparently not
murderous, since, save in the
case of Maclean, none of their
pistols was loaded. These
unhappy youths, who,
after buying their cheap weapons, stuffed them with
gunpowder and paper, and
then went off, with the
certainty of immediate detection, to click them in the
face of
royalty, present a strange problem to the
psychologist. But, though in
each case their actions and their purposes seemed to be so similar, their
fates were
remarkablyvaried. The first of them, Edward Oxford, who fired at
Victoria within a few months of her marriage, was tried for high
treason,
declared to be
insane, and sent to an
asylum for life. It appears, however,
that this
sentence did not
commend itself to Albert, for when, two years
later, John Francis committed the same of fence, and was tried upon the same
charge, the Prince propounced that there was no
insanity in the matter. "The
wretched creature," he told his father, was "not out of his mind, but a
thorough scamp." "I hope," he added, "his trial will be conducted with the
greatest strictness." Apparently it was; at any rate, the jury shared the view
of the Prince, the plea of
insanity was, set aside, and Francis was found
guilty of high
treason and condemned to death; but, as there was no proof of
an
intent to kill or even to wound, this
sentence, after a lengthened
deliberation between the Home Secretary and the Judges, was commuted for one
of
transportation for life. As the law stood, these assaults,
futile as they
were, could only be treated as high
treason; the discrepancy between the
actual deed and the
tremendous penalties involved was
obviouslygrotesque; and
it was, besides, clear that a jury,
knowing that a
verdict of
guilty implied a
sentence of death, would tend to the
alternative course, and find the prisoner
not
guilty but
insane--a
conclusion which, on the face of it, would have
appeared to be the more
reasonable. In 1842,
therefore, an Act was passed
making any attempt to hurt the Queen a misdemeanor, punishable by
transportation for seven years, or
imprisonment, with or without hard labour,
for a term not
exceeding three years--the misdemeanant, at the
discretion of
the Court, "to be
publicly or
privately whipped, as often, and in such manner
and form, as the Court shall direct, not
exceeding thrice." The four
subsequent attempts were all dealt with under this new law; William Bean, in
1842, was
sentenced to eighteen months'
imprisonment; William Hamilton, in
1849, was transported for seven years; and, in 1850, the same
sentence was
passed upon Lieutenant Robert Pate, who struck the Queen on the head with his
cane in Piccadilly. Pate, alone among these delinquents, was of
mature years;
he had held a
commission in the Army, dressed himself as a dandy, and was, the
Prince declared, "manifestly deranged." In 1872 Arthur O'Connor, a youth of
seventeen, fired an unloaded
pistol at the Queen outside Buckingham Palace; he
was immediately seized by John Brown, and
sentenced to one year's
imprisonmentand twenty strokes of the birch rod. It was for his
bravery upon this occasion