and here set them down; because then you would be able to see what
they were like for yourselves, and that would be so much more simpler
than my explaining to you how beautiful they were. Unfortunately,
however, I cannot now call to mind any of them.
I was very proud of this essay, and when I got back to town I called
on a very superior friend of mine, a
critic, and read it to him. I do
not care for him to see any of my usual work, because he really is a
very superior person indeed, and the perusal of it appears to give him
pains inside. But this article, I thought, would do him good.
"What do you think of it?" I asked, when I had finished.
"Splendid," he replied, "excellently arranged. I never knew you were
so well acquainted with the works of the old writers. Why, there is
scarcely a
classic of any note that you have not quoted from. But
where--where," he added, musing, "did you get that last idea but two
from? It's the only one I don't seem to remember. It isn't a bit of
your own, is it?"
He said that, if so, he should
advise me to leave it out. Not that it
was
altogether bad, but that the interpolation of a modern thought
among so
unique a
collection of passages from the ancients seemed to
spoil the scheme.
And he enumerated the various dead-and-buried gentlemen from whom he
appeared to think I had collated my article.
"But," I replied, when I had recovered my
astonishmentsufficiently to
speak, "it isn't a
collection at all. It is all original. I wrote
the thoughts down as they came to me. I have never read any of these
people you mention, except Shakespeare."
Of course Shakespeare was bound to be among them. I am getting to
dislike that man so. He is always being held up before us young
authors as a model, and I do hate models. There was a model boy at
our school, I remember, Henry Summers; and it was just the same there.
It was
continually, "Look at Henry Summers! he doesn't put the
preposition before the verb, and spell business b-i-z!" or, "Why can't
you write like Henry Summers? He doesn't get the ink all over the
copy-book and
half-way up his back!" We got tired of this everlasting
"Look at Henry Summers!" after a while, and so, one afternoon, on the
way home, a few of us lured Henry Summers up a dark court; and when he
came out again he was not worth looking at.
Now it is perpetually, "Look at Shakespeare!" "Why don't you write
like Shakespeare?" "Shakespeare never made that joke. Why don't you
joke like Shakespeare?"
If you are in the play-writing line it is still worse for you. "Why
don't you write plays like Shakespeare's?" they
indignantly say.
"Shakespeare never made his comic man a penny
steamboat captain."
"Shakespeare never made his hero address the girl as 'ducky.' Why
don't you copy Shakespeare?" If you do try to copy Shakespeare, they
tell you that you must be a fool to attempt to
imitate Shakespeare.
Oh, shouldn't I like to get Shakespeare up our street, and punch him!
"I cannot help that," replied my
critical friend--to return to our
previous question--"the germ of every thought and idea you have got in
that article can be traced back to the writers I have named. If you
doubt it, I will get down the books, and show you the passages for
yourself."
But I declined the offer. I said I would take his word for it, and
would rather not see the passages referred to. I felt indignant.
"If," as I said, "these men--these Platos and Socrateses and Ciceros
and Sophocleses and Aristophaneses and Aristotles and the rest of them
had been
takingadvantage of my
absence to go about the world spoiling
my business for me, I would rather not hear any more about them."
And I put on my hat and came out, and I have never tried to write
anything original since.
I dreamed a dream once. (It is the sort of thing a man would dream.
You cannot very well dream anything else, I know. But the phrase
sounds
poetical and biblical, and so I use it.) I dreamed that I was
in a strange country--indeed, one might say an
extraordinary country.
It was ruled entirely by
critics.
The people in this strange land had a very high opinion of
critics--nearly as high an opinion of
critics as the
critics
themselves had, but not, of course, quite--that not being
practicable--and they had agreed to be guided in all things by the
critics. I stayed some years in that land. But it was not a cheerful
place to live in, so I dreamed.
There were authors in this country, at first, and they wrote books.
But the
critics could find nothing original in the books
whatever, and
said it was a pity that men, who might be usefully employed hoeing
potatoes, should waste their time and the time of the
critics, which