things to their former state, and in punishing or pardoning the
guilty; but no sooner did he depart again to his wars, and to his
various other concerns, than they broke out into the same excesses,
and this they
repeated no less than three times, and he at length
laid a plan for their utter extermination, and it was the
following:- He commenced building a wall, and he summoned unto him
the people small and great, and he allotted to every man his place,
and to every
workman his duty, and he stationed the Zingarri and
their chieftains apart; and in one particular spot he placed a band
of soldiers, and he commanded them to kill whomsoever he should
send to them; and having done so, he called to him the heads of the
people, and he filled the cup for them and clothed them in splendid
vests; and when the turn came to the Zingarri, he
likewise pledged
one of them, and bestowed a vest upon him, and sent him with a
message to the soldiers, who, as soon as he arrived, tore from him
his vest, and stabbed him, pouring forth the gold of his heart into
the pan of
destruction, (14) and in this way they continued until
the last of them was destroyed; and by that blow he exterminated
their race, and their traces, and from that time forward there were
no more rebellions in Samarcand.'
It has of late years been one of the favourite theories of the
learned, that Timour's
invasion of Hindostan, and the cruelties
committed by his
savage hordes in that part of the world, caused a
vast number of Hindoos to
abandon their native land, and that the
Gypsies of the present day are the descendants of those exiles who
wended their weary way to the West. Now, provided the above
passage in the work of Arabschah be entitled to credence, the
opinion that Timour was the cause of the expatriation and
subsequent wandering life of these people, must be
abandoned as
untenable. At the time he is stated by the Arabian
writer to have
annihilated the Gypsy hordes of Samarcand, he had but just
commenced his
career of
conquest and devastation, and had not even
directed his thoughts to the
invasion of India; yet at this early
period of the history of his life, we find families of Zingarri
established at Samarcand, living much in the same manner as others
of the race have
subsequently" target="_blank" title="a.其次,接着">
subsequently done in various towns of Europe and
the East; but supposing the event here narrated to be a fable, or
at best a floating legend, it appears
singular that, if they left
their native land to escape from Timour, they should never have
mentioned in the Western world the name of that
scourge of the
human race, nor detailed the history of their
flight and
sufferings, which
assuredly would have procured them
sympathy; the
ravages of Timour being already but too well known in Europe. That
they came from India is much easier to prove than that they fled
before the
fierce Mongol.
Such people as the Gypsies, whom the Bishop of Forli in the year
1422, only sixteen years
subsequent to the
invasion of India,
describes as a 'raging rabble, of
brutal and animal propensities,'
(15) are not such as generally
abandon their country on foreign
invasion.
THE ZINCALI OR AN ACCOUNT OF THE GYPSIES OF SPAIN - PART I
CHAPTER I
GITANOS, or Egyptians, is the name by which the Gypsies have been
most generally known in Spain, in the ancient as well as in the
modern period, but various other names have been and still are
applied to them; for example, New Castilians, Germans, and
Flemings; the first of which titles probably originated after the
name of Gitano had begun to be considered a term of
reproach and
infamy. They may have thus designated themselves from an
unwillingness to utter, when
speaking of themselves, the detested
expression 'Gitano,' a word which seldom escapes their mouths; or
it may have been
applied to them first by the Spaniards, in their
mutual dealings and
communication, as a term less calculated to
wound their feelings and to beget a spirit of
animosity than the
other; but, however it might have originated, New Castilian, in
course of time, became a term of little less infamy than Gitano;
for, by the law of Philip the Fourth, both terms are
forbidden to
be
applied to them under
severe penalties.