Politics often
inspire the electors;
occasionally (I have heard)
grave seniors use their influence,
mainly for reasons of
academicpolicy.
In December 1887 Murray writes about an
election in which Mr. Lowell
was a
candidate. `A
pitiful protest was entered by an' (epithets
followed by a proper name) `against Lowell, on the score of his
being an alien. Mallock, as you learn, was
withdrawn, for which I
am truly thankful.' Unlucky Mr. Mallock! `Lowell polled 100 and
Gibson 92 . . . The intrigues and
corruption appear to be almost
worthy of an American Presidential
election.' Mr. Lowell could not
accept a
compliment which pleased him, because of his official
position, and the
misfortune of his birth!
Murray was already doing a very little `miniature journalism,' in
the form of University Notes for a local paper. He complains of the
ultra Caledonian
frankness with which men told him that they were
very bad. A
needless, if friendly, outspokenness was a feature in
Scottish
character which he did not easily
endure. He wrote a good
deal of verse in the little University paper, now called College
Echoes.
If Murray ever had any
definite idea of being ordained for the
ministry in any `denomination,' he
abandoned it. His `bursaries'
(scholarships or exhibitions), on which he had been passing rich,
expired, and he had to earn a
livelihood. It seems plain to myself
that he might easily have done so with his pen. A young friend of
my own (who will excuse me for thinking that his bright verses are
not BETTER than Murray's)
promptly made, by these alone, an income
which to Murray would have been affluence. But this could not be
done at St. Andrews. Again, Murray was not in
contact with people
in the centre of newspapers and magazines. He went very little into
general society, even at St. Andrews, and thus failed, perhaps, to
make acquaintances who might have been `useful.' He would have
scorned the idea of making useful acquaintances. But without
seeking them, why should we
reject any
friendliness when it offers
itself? We are all members one of another. Murray speaks of his
experience of human beings, as rich in examples of kindness and
good-will. His shyness, his reserve, his
extreme unselfishness,--
carried to the point of diffidence,--made him rather shun than seek
older people who were
dangerously likely to be serviceable. His
manner, when once he could be induced to meet strangers, was
extremely frank and pleasant, but from meeting strangers he shrunk,
in his inveterate modesty.
In 1886 Murray had the
misfortune to lose is father, and it became,
perhaps, more prominently needful that he should find a profession.
He now assisted Professor Meiklejohn of St. Andrews in various kinds
of
literary and
academic work, and in him found a friend, with whom
he remained in close
intercourse to the last. He began the weary
path, which all
literary beginners must tread, of sending
contributions to magazines. He seldom read magazine articles. `I
do not greatly care for "Problems" and "vexed questions." I am so
much of a problem and a vexed question that I have quite enough to
do in searching for a
solution of my own personality.' He tried a
story, based on `a
midnight experience' of his own; unluckily he
does not tell us what that experience was. Had he encountered one
of the local ghosts?
`My blood-curdling
romance I offered to the editor of Longman's
Magazine, but that misguided person was so ill-advised as to return
it, accompanied with one of these
abominable lithographed forms
conveying his hypocritical regrets.' Murray sent a directed
envelope with a twopenny-halfpenny stamp. The paper came back for
three-halfpence by book-post. `I have serious thoughts of sueing
him for the odd penny!' `Why should people be fools enough to read
my rot when they have twenty volumes of Scott at their command?' He
confesses to `a Scott-mania almost as
intense as if he were the last
new sensation.' `I was always fond of him, but I am fonder than
ever now.' This
plunge into the
immortalromances seems really to
have discouraged Murray; at all events he says very little more
about attempts in
fiction of his own. `I am a
barren rascal,' he
writes, quoting Johnson on Fielding. Like other men, Murray felt
extreme difficulty in
writing articles or tales which have an
infinitesimal chance of being accepted. It needs a stout heart to
face this almost fixed
certainty of
rejection: a man is weakened by
his apprehensions of a lithographed form, and of his old manuscript
coming home to roost, like the Graces of Theocritus, to pine in the
dusty chest where is their chill abode. If the Alexandrian poets
knew this ill-fortune, so do all beginners in letters. There is