ever yet led to the
commission of crying
injustice; the Jews were
doomed to
persecution and
destruction on two accounts, - their
great
riches, and their high
superiority over the Spaniards in
learning and
intellect. Avarice has always been the dominant
passion in Spanish minds, their rage for money being only to be
compared to the wild
hunger of wolves for horse-flesh in the time
of winter: next to
avarice, envy of superior
talent and
accomplishment is the
prevailingpassion. These two detestable
feelings united, proved the ruin of the Jews in Spain, who were,
for a long time, an eyesore, both to the
clergy and laity, for
their great
riches and
learning. Much the same causes insured the
expulsion of the Moriscos, who were abhorred for their superior
industry, which the Spaniards would not
imitate;
whilst the
reformation was kept down by the gaunt arm of the Inquisition, lest
the property of the church should pass into other and more
deserving hands. The faggot piles in the squares of Seville and
Madrid, which consumed the bodies of the Hebrew, the Morisco, and
the Protestant, were lighted by
avarice and envy, and those same
piles would
likewise have consumed the mulatto
carcass of the
Gitano, had he been
learned and
wealthy enough to become obnoxious
to the two master
passions of the Spaniards.
Of all the Spanish writers who have written
concerning the Gitanos,
the one who appears to have been most scandalised at the want of
religion observable
amongst them, and their
contempt for things
sacred, was a certain Doctor Sancho De Moncada.
This
worthy, whom we have already had occasion to mention, was
Professor of Theology at the University of Toledo, and shortly
after the
expulsion of the Moriscos had been brought about by the
intrigues of the monks and robbers who thronged the court of Philip
the Third, he
endeavoured to get up a cry against the Gitanos
similar to that with which for the last half-century Spain had
resounded against the
unfortunate and oppressed Africans, and to
effect this he published a
discourse, entitled 'The Expulsion of
the Gitanos,' addressed to Philip the Third, in which he conjures
that
monarch, for the sake of
morality and everything
sacred, to
complete the good work he had commenced, and to send the Gitanos
packing after the Moriscos.
Whether this
discourse produced any benefit to the author, we have
no means of ascertaining. One thing is certain, that it did no
harm to the Gitanos, who still continue in Spain.
If he had other expectations, he must have understood very little
of the
genius of his countrymen, or of King Philip and his court.
It would have been easier to get up a
crusade against the wild cats
of the sierra, than against the Gitanos, as the former have skins
to
reward those who slay them. His
discourse, however, is well
worthy of perusal, as it exhibits some
learning, and comprises many
curious details
respecting the Gitanos, their habits, and their
practices. As it is not very lengthy, we here subjoin it, hoping
that the reader will excuse its many absurdities, for the sake of
its many
valuable facts.
CHAPTER X
'SIRE,
'The people of God were always afflicted by the Egyptians, but the
Supreme King delivered them from their hands by means of many
miracles, which are
related in the Holy Scriptures; and now,
without having
recourse to so many, but only by means of the
miraculous
talent which your Majesty possesses for expelling such
reprobates, he will,
doubtless, free this kingdom from them, which
is what is supplicated in this
discourse, and it behoves us, in the
first place, to consider
'WHO ARE THE GITANOS?
'Writers generally agree that the first time the Gitanos were seen
in Europe was the year 1417, which was in the time of Pope Martinus
the Fifth and King Don John the Second; others say that Tamerlane
had them in his camp in 1401, and that their captain was Cingo,
from
whence it is said that they call themselves Cingary. But the
opinions
concerning their
origin are infinite.
'The first is that they are foreigners, though authors
differ much
with respect to the country from
whence they came. The majority
say that they are from Africa, and that they came with the Moors
when Spain was lost; others that they are Tartars, Persians,
Cilicians, Nubians, from Lower Egypt, from Syria, or from other
parts of Asia and Africa, and others consider them to be
descendants of Chus, son of Cain; others say that they are of
European
origin, Bohemians, Germans, or outcasts from other nations
of this quarter of the world.
'The second and sure opinion is, that those who prowl about Spain
are not Egyptians, but swarms of wasps and atheistical wretches,
without any kind of law or religion, Spaniards, who have introduced
this Gypsy life or sect, and who admit into it every day all the
idle and broken people of Spain. There are some foreigners who
would make Spain the
origin and
fountain of all the Gypsies of
Europe, as they say that they proceeded from a river in Spain
called Cija, of which Lucan makes mention; an opinion, however, not
much adopted
amongst the
learned. In the opinion of
respectableauthors, they are called Cingary or Cinli, because they in every
respect
resemble the bird cinclo, which we call in Spanish
Motacilla, or aguzanieve (wagtail), which is a
vagrant bird and
builds no nest, (37) but broods in those of other birds, a bird
restless and poor of
plumage, as AElian writes.
'THE GITANOS ARE VERY HURTFUL TO SPAIN
'There is not a nation which does not consider them as a most
pernicious rabble; even the Turks and Moors abominate them,
amongstwhom this sect is found under the names of Torlaquis, (38)
Hugiemalars, and Dervislars, of whom some historians make mention,
and all agree that they are most evil people, and highly
detrimental to the country where they are found.
'In the first place, because in all parts they are considered as
enemies of the states where they
wander, and as spies and traitors
to the crown; which was proven by the
emperors Maximilian and
Albert, who declared them to be such in public edicts; a fact easy
to be believed, when we consider that they enter with ease into the
enemies' country, and know the languages of all nations.
'Secondly, because they are idle
vagabond people, who are in no
respect useful to the kingdom; without
commerce,
occupation, or
trade of any
description; and if they have any it is making
picklocks and pothooks for appearance sake, being wasps, who only
live by sucking and impoverishing the country, sustaining
themselves by the sweat of the
miserable labourers, as a German
poet has said of them:-
"Quos aliena juvant, propriis habitare molestum,
Fastidit patrium non nisi nosse solum."
They are much more
useless than the Moriscos, as these last were of
some service to the state and the royal revenues, but the Gitanos
are neither labourers, gardeners,
mechanics, nor merchants, and
only serve, like the wolves, to
plunder and to flee.
'Thirdly, because the Gitanas are public harlots, common, as it is
said, to all the Gitanos, and with dances,
demeanour, and filthy
songs, are the cause of
continual detriment to the souls of the
vassals of your Majesty, it being
notorious that they have done
infinite harm in many
honourable houses by separating the married
women from their husbands, and perverting the maidens: and
finally, in the best of these Gitanas any one may recognise all the
signs of a harlot given by the wise king; they are gadders about,
whisperers, always unquiet in places and corners.
'Fourthly, because in all parts they are accounted famous thieves,
about which authors write wonderful things; we ourselves have
continual experience of this fact in Spain, where there is scarcely
a corner where they have not committed some heavy offence.
'Father Martin Del Rio says they were
notorious when he was in Leon
in the year 1584; as they even attempted to sack the town of
Logrono in the time of the pest, as Don Francisco De Cordoba writes