But souls of lighter guilt abide a year in Tartarus, and then drift
out down the streams Cocytus and Pyriphlegethon. Thence they reach
the marsh of Acheron, but are not released until they have received
the
pardon of the souls whom in life they had injured.
All this, and much more to the same purpose in other dialogues of
Plato's, appears to have been derived by Socrates from the popular
unphilosophic traditions, from Folk-lore in short, and to have been
raised by him to the rank of "pious opinion," if not of dogma. Now,
Lucretius represents nothing but the
reaction against all this dread
of future doom, whether that dread was inculcated by Platonic
philosophy or by popular
belief. The latter must have been much the
more powerful and widely diffused. It follows that the Romans, at
least, must have been
haunted by a
constant dread of judgment to
come, from which, but for the
testimony of Lucretius and his
manifest
sincerity, we might have believed them free.
Perhaps we may regret the
existence of this Roman religion, for it
did its best to ruin a great poet. The sublimity of the language of
Lucretius, when he can leave his attempts at
scientific proof, the
closeness of his
observation, his
enjoyment of life, of Nature, and
his power of
painting them, a certain largeness of touch, and noble
amplitude of manner--these, with a burning
sincerity, mark him above
all others that smote the Latin lyre. Yet these great qualities are
half-crushed by his task, by his attempt to turn the
atomic theory
into verse, by his unsympathetic effort to destroy all faith and
hope, because these were united, in his mind, with dread of Styx and
Acheron.
It is an almost
intolerablephilosophy, the
philosophy of eternal
sleep, without dreams and without
awakening. This
belief is
whollydivorced from joy, which inspires all the best art. This negation
of hope has "close-lipped Patience for its only friend."
In vain does Lucretius paint pictures of life and Nature so large,
so glowing, so
majestic that they
remind us of nothing but the "Fete
Champetre" of Giorgione, in the Louvre. All that life is a thing we
must leave soon, and forever, and must be
hopelessly lapped in an
eternity of blind silence. "I shall let men see the certain end of
all," he cries; "then will they
resist religion, and the threats of
priests and prophets." But this "certain end" is exactly what
mortals do not desire to see. To this sleep they prefer even
tenebras Orci, vastasque lacunas.
They will not be deprived of gods, "the friends of man, merciful
gods, compassionate." They will not turn from even a faint hope in
those to the Lucretian deities in their endless and indifferent
repose and
divine "delight in
mortal" target="_blank" title="a.不死的n.不朽的人物">
immortal and
peaceful life, far, far
away from us and ours--life painless and
fearless, needing nothing
we can give, replete with its own
wealth,
unmoved by prayer and
promise,
untouched by anger."
Do you remember that hymn, as one may call it, of Lucretius to
Death, to Death which does not harm us. "For as we knew no hurt of
old, in ages when the Carthaginian thronged against us in war, and
the world was
shaken with the shock of fight, and
dubious hung the
empire over all things
mortal by sea and land, even so
careless, so
unmoved, shall we remain, in days when we shall no more exist, when
the bond of body and soul that makes our life is broken. Then
naught shall move us, nor wake a single sense, not though earth with
sea be mingled, and sea with sky." There is no hell, he cries, or,
like Omar, he says, "Hell is the
vision of a soul on fire."
Your true Tityus, gnawed by the vulture, is only the slave of
passion and of love; your true Sisyphus (like Lord Salisbury in
Punch) is only the
politician, striving always, never attaining; the
stone rolls down again from the hill-crest, and thunders far along
the plain.
Thus his
philosophy, which gives him such a
delightful sense of
freedom, is rejected after all these years of trial by men. They
feel that since those remotest days
"Quum Venus in silvis jungebat corpora amantum,"
they have travelled the long, the weary way Lucretius describes to
little avail, if they may not keep their hopes and fears. Robbed of
these we are robbed of all; it serves us nothing to have conquered
the soil and fought the winds and waves, to have built cities, and
tamed fire, if the world is to be "dispeopled of its dreams."
Better were the old life we started from, and dreams therewith,
better the free days -
"Novitas tum
florida mundi
Pabula dia tulit, miseris mortablibus ampla;"
than
wealth or power, and neither hope nor fear, but one certain end
of all before the eyes of all.
Thus the heart of man has answered, and will answer Lucretius, the
noblest Roman poet, and the least
beloved, who sought, at last, by
his own hand, they say, the doom that Virgil waited for in the
season appointed.
TO A YOUNG AMERICAN BOOK-HUNTER
To Philip Dodsworth, Esq., New York.
Dear Dodsworth,--Let me
congratulate you on having joined the army
of book-hunters. "Everywhere have I sought peace and found it
nowhere," says the
blessed Thomas e Kempis, "save in a corner with a
book." Whether that good monk wrote the "De Imitatione Christi" or
not, one always likes him for his love of books. Perhaps he was the
only book-hunter that ever
wrought a
miracle. "Other signs and
miracles which he was wont to tell as having happened at the prayer
of an unnamed person, are believed to have been granted to his own,
such as the sudden reappearance of a lost book in his cell." Ah, if
Faith, that moveth mountains, could only bring back the books we
have lost, the books that have been borrowed from us! But we are a
faithless generation.
From a
collector so much older and better
experienced in misfortune
than yourself, you ask for some advice on the sport of book-hunting.
Well, I will give it; but you will not take it. No; you will hunt
wild, like young pointers before they are
properly broken.
Let me suppose that you are "to middle fortune born," and that you
cannot
stroll into the great book-marts and give your orders freely
for all that is rich and rare. You are obliged to wait and watch an
opportunity, to
practise that maxim of the Stoic's, "Endure and
abstain." Then
abstain from rushing at every
volume, however out of
the line of your
literary interests, which seems to be a
bargain.
Probably it is not even a
bargain; it can seldom be cheap to you, if
you do not need it, and do not mean to read it.
Not that any
collector reads all his books. I may have, and indeed
do possess, an Aldine Homer and Caliergus his Theocritus; but I
prefer to study the authors in a cheap German
edition. The old
editions we buy
mainly for their beauty, and the
sentiment of their
antiquity and their associations.
But I don't take my own advice. The
shelves are
crowded with books
quite out of my line--a whole small library of tomes on the pastime
of curling, and I don't curl; and "God's Revenge against Murther,"
though (so far) I am not an
assassin. Probably it was for love of
Sir Walter Scott, and his mention of this truculent
treatise, that I
purchased it. The full title of it is "The Triumphs of God's
Revenge against the Crying and Execrable Sinne of (willful and
premeditated) Murther." Or rather there is nearly a
column more of
title, which I spare you. But the pictures are so bad as to be
nearly worth the price. Do not waste your money, like your foolish
adviser, on books like that, or on "Les Sept Visions de Don
Francisco de Quevedo," published at Cologne, in 1682.
Why in the world did I purchase this, with the title-page showing
Quevedo asleep, and all his seven
visions floating round him in
little circles like soap-bubbles? Probably because the book was
published by Clement Malassis, and perhaps he was a
forefather of
that whimsical Frenchman, Poulet Malassis, who published for
Banville, and Baudelaire, and Charles Asselineau. It was a bad
reason. More likely the mere cheapness attracted me.
Curiosity, not cheapness,
assuredly, betrayed me into another
purchase. If I want to read "The Pilgrim's Progress," of course I